Find The Best Attorney For Your Case
(312) 346-5320 or (800) 517-1614
Free Consultations - 24/7
No Appointment Needed, Just Call

Illinois Lawyers Blog, Talk To An Attorney For Free

images (2)

Can I sue my lawyer? It’s a basic question, but a good one. Some people worry that it’s not possible to sue a lawyer. It is. If your lawyer commits malpractice, you can sue for any damages it causes you.

Do I need a lawyer to sue my lawyer? It’s a good idea to find an experienced legal malpractice lawyer to go after the first lawyer. We know that sounds like a lot of lawyers, but legal malpractice cases are complex and a niche area of law. You simply have a better chance at succeeding if you hire someone who has done it before.

What counts as legal malpractice? It’s professional negligence. If your lawyer failed to act as they should when handling your case, then it can constitute malpractice. An expert will testify as to what your lawyer should have done. It generally has to be more than a mistake, and if your lawyer made a judgment call that turned out to be wrong, that also might not be enough.

How much money can I get? The amount you can recover in a legal malpractice lawsuit depends on your provable damages. This is the financial harm that you suffered as a result of the malpractice. In a failed real estate deal, for example, you can probably put your loss into a dollar amount. This is where some potential legal malpractice cases get weeded out – if you don’t have monetary damages, you probably don’t have a case.

Am I likely to win? There’s one other major part of a legal malpractice case, in addition to proving negligence and showing your monetary damages. You also have to prove that if your lawyer had done what they should have done, you would have won the case. So if you are in a car accident and sue the other driver for $30,000 but your lawyer blows the deadline and you get nothing, you‘ll have to prove that you would have won the car accident case if your lawyer hadn’t missed the deadline. It’s essentially two cases in one.

You don’t have to decide on your own whether you have a legal malpractice case worth pursuing. Most legal malpractice attorneys in Illinois will give you a free initial consultation, where you can ask questions and get their opinion on whether you have a good case.

If you would like our help in finding a lawyer or just have questions, fill out the box to the right or call us at (800) 517-1614.

 

See also: FAQ guardianship of an adult

little_girl_reading_600x399

If you read my blog, you know that I am not a believer in “father’s rights” type marketing strategies.  It’s the stuff of snake oil salesmen in my opinion.  If you care about your clients then you do whatever you can for them.

I do think some laws are unfair though. The biggest violator has to be Illinois child support laws.

What is wrong is that the amount you pay or receive does not reflect in any way the amount of time you spend with your child or what you do for them financially.  If you are paying support for one kid, you’ll pay 20% of your net take home pay.  Two kids is 28%.  Three is 32% and so on.

But if you have your kids 50% of the time (man or woman) and your ex has the other 50%, one of you is still going to pay child support to the other.  How is that fair?  What if the Dad has the kids four days/nights and the Mom has them three?  Should the Mom have to still pay the full amount?  It’s not right.

It’s definitely not a male/female issue.  People get screwed equally.  It’s not just based on the time spent with the kids.  How about the fact that you can be making $35,000 a year and your ex could make $400,000 a year and you’d still have to pay them child support if they have primary custody.  I know Illinois can be a screwed up state, but that is ridiculous.

This happens because “this is how it’s always been done.”  What made sense 50 years ago doesn’t necessarily make sense now.  And to change this wouldn’t require more litigation, it would just require more organization and a willingness to look at what is really going on.  Here’s what I’d propose:

-If your ex earns more than four times or $100,000 more than you do, your child support payments can’t exceed half of the current statutory minimums (so if you have two kids, you’d pay 14%).
-If you can prove that you spend at least 40% of the non-school hours with your child, then you should be eligible for the same deduction.  Perhaps this would encourage some listless parents to spend more time with their kids.
-If you lose a job or have a reduction in salary, let’s create an easier way to modify your payments without having to hire a lawyer and go to court.  And if you get a raise, you should be required to report it within 30 days for modification of be subject to having to pay back the increase retroactively.
-And given how many employers pay their employees cash under the table, enabling those parents from having to pay child support, I’d be in favor of allowing the other parent to sue the employer because their breaking of the law is hurting the child.
-I’d have child support issues handled by Arbitrators, not Judges, if that was the only issue in the case.  That way it would take less time and money to get a result.  Put both parties under oath, ask them questions about their wages and go from there.  These hearings should not take nearly as long as they currently do.

While we are at it, let’s address college support payments.  In an ideal world, parents would be able to afford to send their kids to college.  I certainly hope to do so for my kids.  If my wife and I stay married then it will be up to us as to whether or not to pay all or part of their college expenses.  But if we were to get divorced then I’d be forced to do so.  That makes no sense at all.  A much better idea would be to make sure that 529 college savings plans can’t be touched until the child is either in school or has turned 20 and has not yet gone to college.  But if you never saved for college while you were married, why do you get forced to pay it once divorced?

This system wouldn’t be perfect.  Nothing is.  But the goal should always be to make our laws better and fairer.

shutterstock_23318308_crop380wWhile our law firm is known for being the place to get the right attorney recommendation for your case, we also provide free legal guidance to anyone that wants to ask us a question.

We don’t promise that we will always know the answer, but after 13 plus years in business and having talked to over 300,000 people, there is almost no legal situation that we haven’t seen before.

Many of the questions we get start off with callers asking “Is it legal to” and go from there.

Some of these are simple such as is it legal for a 20 year old to have sex with a 16 year old (it’s not) or can an employer fire you if you don’t show up to work, but it’s the first time that you did it and there was no warning (they can).

But most of the calls we get can’t be answered by hearing just one sentence from someone. Cases are always fact specific so getting more information can change our answer. Even in the example above, if you are fired for a first time no show, but employees of a different race are allowed to blow off work without punishment then you might have a racial discrimination claim.

A recent caller to our office wanted to know if the foot drop she got after a medical procedure was the basis of a lawsuit for malpractice. Similarly a man who had his leg amputated following an foot infection wanted to know if that was a case. The answers to both were that there are certain indicators that would tell us if it was a case or not (the amputee has diabetes which can lead to blood flow problems), but there is no way to give a definitive answer without seeing medical records.

This happens in all areas of law. Some that contact us want to know if it was illegal that the cops searched their car. Again, we need the whole picture to answer that question in a reliable way. That would include seeing the police report. We’ll give an opinion as to what we think is likely the answer, but you should want something more definitive.

“Do I have a case if I feel in the parking lot on my way in to work and broke my ankle?” Well, we’d need to know what caused you to fall, who owns the parking lot, it is for employees only or the public too and many other things.

The bottom line is that if you read legal websites that provide answers to questions, you have to remember that every case is different. Just because some lawyer didn’t think a different person had a good case does not mean that you don’t.

We will always review your case for free and give you an honest answer. We’ll ask probing questions (all calls are confidential) that will give us lots of information and help us offer an educated opinion. But having this full picture will allow us to best serve you. And believe it or not, sometimes getting the full picture can take 20-30 minutes on the phone (always free) and other times it can take one minute. Every case is different.

See also: Can An Illinois Attorney Have Sex With A Client?

assassin

We’ve written about what you should do after an accident. Here are things you should not do.

 

  1. Don’t forget to get a police report. If your goal is to prove that the other driver is at fault, and we assume that is your goal if you’re considering legal action, then you will need a police report. It’s an important piece of evidence that you won’t get if you don’t call the police to the scene of the accident. If it’s a major accident, they’ll obviously be there. If it seems minor, you should still call and get this report in case you realize later that you are more injured than you thought. Also, don’t be tempted if the other driver tries to discourage police involvement and just pay you instead. If they’re at fault, they might try this. If you agree, and they drive away, you might never hear from them again if you change your mind.
  2. Don’t compare your case to someone else’s. There are some similarities among accident cases, but there also are specific differences. Usually these differences exist because of specific facts. The law might be the same, but it can be applied differently in different situations. You might hear stories from family members or friends or coworkers about what happened in their accident case. You really can’t assume it would apply to you. An experienced attorney is the best person to give you advice and help you set realistic expectations.
  3. Don’t wait too long to get a lawyer. We understand why people wait. You’re wondering what the best approach might be, whether you even have a case and how much it would cost to get a lawyer. While you’re pondering all of this, evidence is disappearing and witnesses are forgetting what happened. It’s free to talk to a lawyer about your Illinois accident case, and there is no attorney fee involved at all unless you win. Illinois law only gives you a certain amount of time to file a lawsuit, and if you wait too long, you lose your chance.
  4. Don’t share a lawyer. The problem with sharing a lawyer is that a lawyer cannot protect two clients on either side of a legal issue. Your interests are at odds with the other side, even if things are friendly. If you agree to share a lawyer with the person who caused your accident, it’s safe to say that you aren’t going to get an outcome that is fair to you. In the worst case, you could fail to recover the money you need to pay your medical bills and other losses.
  5. Don’t plead guilty. Don’t plead guilty unless it’s at the advice of an experienced lawyer whom you trust.  Otherwise, you are accepting an outcome that can be avoided in many cases. Even if you don’t think you have a choice, talk to your attorney first.

The class action lawsuits against General Motors after the faulty ignition switch issue are growing, as GM adds even more vehicles to the list. This is quickly becoming one of the largest cases ever. We are looking for plaintiffs who own any of the following GM models. These are the latest models to be added to the recall:

Buick Lacrosse (2005-2009)

Chevrolet Impala (2006-2014)

Cadillac Deville (2000-2005)

Cadillac DTS (2007-2011)

Buick Lucerne (2006-2011)

Buick Regal LS & GS (2004-2005)

Chevrolet Monte Carlo (2006-2008)

Chevrolet Camaro (2010-2014)

A few months ago, GM announced that more than a million vehicles were being recalled because of a malfunctioning ignition switch. The error had already led to many accidents and GM acknowledged 12 fatalities, as well. The most alarming aspect of the case was that GM knew about the faulty ignition years before it finally came forward.

The story may not be at the top of the news anymore, but it’s far from over. Any owner of a vehicle on the list – not just those injured in an accident – may be able to seek compensation. Damages can include the decreased value of your vehicle.

Class action lawsuits work best in this type of case because many consumers can join together against a large corporation. It’s a lawsuit they wouldn’t have as good of a chance of winning on their own, and it definitely gets the attention of the defendant in a way an individual would not.

These cases often end in settlement, with each member of the class sharing in the final amount paid by the defendant. If you own one of the models listed above, or if you have questions about what a class action involves or what would be required to get involved, give us a call.

You can contact us online or by calling us at 312-346-5320 or 800-517-1614. You can talk to our lawyers for free. There is no obligation to go forward and get involved, so feel free to just call with questions you might have.

medical-negligence

One of the hardest things I have to do in my job is tell people that they don’t have a case.  It’s not hard professionally because I always give honest answers.  But it can be hard personally since it’s heart-breaking to hear someone’s story of pain and then let them know that that there’s nothing we can do for them.  I may be a lawyer, but that doesn’t mean I have no heart.

This happens most often with calls about medical malpractice.  Even in Cook County, success rates for cases that go to trial are only 20% and that is considered very plaintiff friendly.  Of course many cases settle, but that doesn’t change the fact that a ton of claims go nowhere.

I was speaking to a malpractice attorney in Chicago who I am friends with and he said that his law firm files a lawsuit in about one out of every 100 cases that they review.  That’s true for most firms for many reasons.  The biggest is that these cases are expensive to bring and if you don’t have clear cut negligence AND very big, permanent damages, the costs wouldn’t justify proceeding.  It does allow many healthcare professionals to get away with mistakes and bad treatment.

My friend told me a great way that he explains to potential clients that they don’t have a case. It has to do more with the doctor screwing up, but not bad enough to make it a claim.

In general, you can’t successfully sue for something that is considered a general risk of a medical procedure.  For example, if you have a surgery and get an infection, that’s not likely a case because it’s a risk of being cut open.

To bring a lawsuit, your lawyer needs to find a reputable physician who is willing to testify that the person who took care of you screwed up.  My friend tells his clients that he can’t have a doctor review your records and give the treating doc a grade of a C- or even a D.  It has to be an F minus.  In other words, you need to review the treatment and say that what happened absolutely should not have occurred.

I wasn’t the best student in the world, but I wasn’t getting C minuses or D’s.  But if I did you could say that I passed or did something right even if it wasn’t great.   Well, if the insurance defense attorney can make that argument to a jury, then they are probably going to win or at least find one juror to side with them.  You need a unanimous jury to win, so if one is against you that won’t happen.

Because most screw-ups are not F minuses, it explains why you might not be able to find anyone to represent you.  Even if a failing grade appears, you still need catastrophic damages.  All of this is why bringing and winning a suit is very difficult.

Please don’t read this post and assume that you have no case.  There are exceptions to everything.  Also, it doesn’t cost anything to talk to us and evaluate whether or not something can be done or not.

download (7)

Botched surgery cases are medical malpractice cases, which are personal injury cases against a health care provider. You are alleging that your doctor was negligent and caused you harm as a result. These cases involve more than an unfavorable outcome. They are cases where the doctor screwed up, making more than just an honest mistake.

A botched surgery can be one of those cases where a piece of medical equipment or gauze is accidentally left inside a patient during surgery. It can also be unnecessary complications from a surgery that wasn’t performed properly or shouldn’t have been done in the first place. It can also be something severe, such as amputation of the wrong limb, permanent scarring or disfigurement, or even death.

In any medical malpractice case, the key is proving that the health care provider – the surgeon for example – acted below the standard of care. You’ll have to show that a reasonable doctor in the same position would not have done what yours did. In order to prove this, you’ll use a medical expert who will testify that this is the case. Medical malpractice lawsuits hinge on the opinions of these experts.

In general, medical malpractice cases are complex. They are also expensive for the attorney you hire, because they are the ones (or the should be the ones) paying for all the expenses up front. Expert witness fees can be thousands of dollars. They also don’t charge you for their time upfront. Only when, and if, you win the case does your attorney get a fee. This is why it’s important to hire a firm with a lot of resources and experience in this type of case. It’s not uncommon for a medical malpractice case to cost $100,000.

In light of these things, medical malpractice attorneys are picky about the cases that they take. It’s often a business decision. If there is not a significant injury, it won’t be worth the large expense to the firm. You can always get a consultation with an Illinois medical malpractice attorney to go over your case. It’s free, so there’s nothing to lose in looking into your options.  Contact us if you’d like our help.

 

custody

 

I would never call myself a “fathers’ rights lawyer” or “mothers’ rights lawyer.”  I believe the firms that do that are really just trying to scare you in to hiring them.  A lawyer either fights for you or they don’t.  Tricking somebody in to thinking you have a passion for your work isn’t the way to do things.

But I do call it like I see it.  Sometimes that means telling a client that they are wrong even though it’s not what they want to hear.  Other times it involves pointing out a law that is incredibly unfair, even if it makes me sound like I’m just stumping for fathers.

That said, the law in Illinois with respect to voluntary acknowledgement of paternity is terrible and needs to be changed.  If a man signs the birth certificate of a child and acknowledges that he is the father, he has 60 days in which he can rescind that.  So if you’ve been dating a girl for two years and she gets pregnant, if you sign assuming you are the father, that means that you are legally the father.  This is true if (as happened to a caller to my office) five years later you have a paternity test done and learn that you aren’t really the biological Dad.  So you can end up paying child support for a child that isn’t yours.

Once sixty days has passed, the only way to vacate signing is to file a 2-1401 petition on the limited grounds of fraud, duress, or material mistake of fact.  That’s a lot harder than it sounds and it must be filed within two years from the date you originally signed.  Duress would be something like a gun was placed to your head.  Fraud could be a faked paternity test.

The safest thing to do is never sign in the first place without a paternity test.  That doesn’t sound very romantic, but sometimes the smart thing isn’t romantic or even easy.

Beyond this all though, the law needs to be changed.  Why should you have to support a child that isn’t yours?  It literally makes no sense and I can’t think of one argument in favor of it.  I have no problem not letting the mistaken Dad recoup the money he’s laid out over the years by mistake.  As I said, you should get a paternity test so that’s on him.  But once you do learn the truth, you should be off the hook.

In the worst examples I’ve seen some men have to support a child that isn’t theirs while the real father lives with the kid and doesn’t contribute hardly anything.  It’s just wrong and needs to stop.  We should have the ability to take laws that make no sense and change them.  This one needs to be at the top of the list.

download (2)

The best-case scenario is when you already have a court order in place. We’re talking about a court order for child support, which is a court document that tells one parent what they must pay the other parent for the support of their child or children. If you have one of these, then you have a head start and you can go after the other parent for past-due payments.

You can bring the other parent back to court to force payments. Wage garnishment and other tactics can be used if they continue to refuse to pay. The good news is that it’s really never too late if you have a court order. There isn’t a deadline in Illinois for collecting unpaid child support. Interest on unpaid support should be included, as well.

If you don’t have a court order, you’ll be asking for retroactive child support, which is harder to get. If your child is still a minor, you can get an order for current and future child support, however. Get the help of a child support lawyer in order to give yourself and advantage. Good legal advice also ensures that you avoid pitfalls.

Adult children often wonder if they can collect past-due child support that their parent never paid. Unfortunately, the child themselves cannot collect this, even as an adult. It’s ordered to be paid to the parent, so that parent must be the one who goes after it. It might not be too late to collect, but we tell these individuals that they have to convince their parent to get involved.

Potential obstacles include a parent who has disappeared, or a parent who is unemployed and/or claims to have no income or assets. If the parent who should be paying child support is claiming that they can’t afford it, and you suspect that they are lying, an experienced attorney can help you find out the truth.

Don’t put your ability to collect child support at risk by making private agreements for payment with your ex. And don’t let them off the hook if they haven’t paid. You need to protect your interest – which is really your child’s interest – and maintain your leverage.

download (11)

These cases are unique. The signs and symptoms of asbestos-related illness show up so long after exposure that the typical injury case is not a good model for how an asbestos case should be handled.

The statute of limitations is a bit different for cases like this, where an injury or illness isn’t apparent for a while. In Illinois, it’s called the discovery rule. In a typical injury case, like a slip and fall, you have two years from the date of your injury to file a lawsuit. That’s the statute of limitations, or deadline, on the right to sue. Obviously this wouldn’t work for an asbestos case, where symptoms might not show up for 20-50 years later. Here, the discovery rule comes into play and it says that the clock on the statute of limitations doesn’t running until you realize that you have an asbestos-related injury or illness.

So the general rule is that you have two years from the date you realized you were injured or ill and that asbestos exposure was to blame in order to file a lawsuit. This could be two years from your diagnosis, for example. In cases where a person dies due to asbestos disease, the two years is still from the date of discovery rather than the date of death.

Most people diagnosed with asbestos-related disease are over the age of 65. It’s important to make a quick determination whether you have a legal case. It’s ok to look into this, it’s encouraged even, despite the fact that you might have no idea whom your case would be against. Many times, exposure occurs at a job. Years of regular exposure is likely to blame. Workers who manufactured, installed or removed products with asbestos are at highest risk. There also are cases of secondary exposure, where someone else in the worker’s household was regularly exposed from asbestos particles that came into the home on the worker’s clothes, for example.

There are two main diseases caused by asbestos exposure. Asbestosis and mesothelioma. Symptoms include chronic cough, weight loss, shortness of breath, fatigue, abdominal swelling, tumors and even coughing up blood. Seeing a doctor is obviously a good idea for health reasons, which should be your first concern, but seeing a doctor right away also helps establish a legal case if you decide to pursue one.

There are Illinois attorneys who focus their practice on helping clients suffering from asbestos-related disease and illness. These attorneys, especially the ones who have had success in past cases, are in the best position to advise you on whether you might have a good case and what the applicable deadline might be.

Let us know if you have questions about your situation or if you need help choosing an attorney. You’ve probably seen television or billboard ads for mesothelioma lawyers, but these ads don’t tell you anything specific about those lawyers. We only recommend lawyers with a track record of success, great client reviews and solid reputations among other attorneys and judges in Illinois.

serious

The Family Medical Leave Act, or FMLA, allows you to take time off of work for serious illness or the birth or adoption of a child. The serious illness can be your own, or something affecting a close family member. So you can take the leave for yourself, or to care for a spouse, minor or disabled child, or a parent.

Under the law, you get 12 weeks of leave, per year. The leave is not paid, but there is a guarantee that your job will be waiting for your when you get back. You also get to keep your benefits during your leave. The ability to take FMLA leave generally does not kick in until you have worked for your employer for 12 months and worked at least 1,250 hours in the past year. Employers who have fewer than 50 employees within 75 miles are exempt, meaning that if you work for one of these small employers, you may not be entitled to FMLA leave.

There’s a lot of confusion among employees and employers about what FMLA is for and how it works. What’s worse is that there often is blatant discrimination by employers against employees who take FMLA leave.

Discrimination is illegal. If you take a leave that you are legally entitled to according to FMLA law, then your employer cannot fire you for it. They can’t give away your job while you’re gone, and they can’t fire you once you return in order to punish you for taking a leave. You can’t be discriminated against for asking for FMLA leave and you can’t be passed over for a promotion or denied a raise because you took a leave. These, too, are forms of discrimination.

You can sue your employer if they discriminate against you because of your FMLA leave. You can sue for financial loss, such as pay that you missed out on because of their actions. If you were denied a promotion, you could recover the pay that you should have been earning since that time.

Your employer might have a policy on FMLA with additional rules, such as a requirement that you overlap FMLA with paid sick or vacation time. Some employer policies are perfectly fine, while others violate the law. It’s a good idea to at least check with an Illinois lawyer who knows the intricacies of FMLA law and how it’s applied in various situations. It’s all about protecting your job and your financial stability. Taking time to deal with a serious illness in your family (or a new baby) shouldn’t put all that in jeopardy.

images

The statute or limitations is extended for cases involving childhood sex abuse and molestation cases. Most personal injury cases (sex abuse falls into this category if you’re talking about a lawsuit – a criminal case is separate) have a deadline of about two years. This means that you have two years in most Illinois injury cases to file your lawsuit against any potential defendants.

For childhood sex abuse, Illinois law gives you a larger window to consider what you want to do. The statute of limitations is at least 20 years in most cases. This is the law as of 2011. Older cases might have different deadlines. It’s important to know what applies in your case because if you miss the deadline, you can lose your chance to sue forever.

It’s fairly clear why this deadline is extended for childhood sexual abuse. There are a couple of different reasons. First of all, this kind of abuse is often hidden, and family members are unaware of what’s going on. Secondly, it can take a while for a victim to be ready to come forward. In some cases the memory of what happened is repressed for years and resurfaces later in life. If the deadline were just two years in these cases, many victims wouldn’t get their day in court and the chance to get some sort of justice. If the deadline were short, a lot of perpetrators of the abuse would be able to escape a lawsuit holding them accountable for the harm they caused.

The statute of limitations is 20 years in most cases and those 20 years don’t start until the victim turns 18. Minors aren’t expected to take responsibility for the deadline in such a case. In situations where the memory of the abuse has been repressed, the victim has 20 years from when they realize what happened to them. So for most people who suffered childhood sexual abuse and molestation, the deadline to take legal action is their 38th birthday, which is 20 years after they turn 18. For those who realized the abuse after they turned 18, they have 20 years from whenever it was realized.

Despite these extended deadlines, it’s always better to sue sooner rather than later. Memories are fresher and witnesses are easier to find. Suing 20 years after the fact can be more difficult, although people have definitely done so successfully.

This specific law is a reminder that the statute of limitations isn’t an easy issue. It can change based on the type of case you have and even the specific facts involved. Don’t assume it’s too late for your case, or that you have tons of time to think it over. Talking with an experienced attorney is the best way to be sure of the deadline in your case. If you miss it, you could completely lose your chance to sue.

Finally, if this happened to you, please know that we are very sensitive to how difficult in can be to talk about.  If you call us for legal advice or a lawyer referral we promise to treat you with dignity, respect and keep your information confidential.  We will also do whatever we can to help you.

download (10)

Employees who work for tips should look closely at what they earn and be careful about their employer’s rules regarding their tips. There’s no guarantee that your employer is going to protect your rights under wage laws. It might be up to you.

There are some specific rules, under both state and federal law, on wages. Some relevant laws for tip earners are those that address tip sharing, minimum wage and hourly pay.

Employers are allowed to pay a reduced hourly wage to employees who earn tips. This is called a tip credit rate. Obviously, this reduced hourly rate is a big benefit to an employer, which is why there are laws to protect these employees.

Tip sharing is a big issue. The main thing to know is that your boss can’t share your tips and they can’t make you share your tips with workers who don’t get tips. No managers, cooks or dishwashers should be taking any part of your tips. You can, however, share your tips with other tipped employees. If your employer has set up tip splitting or pooling, that is generally allowed.

Another issue is minimum wage. It does still apply. Even though you earn a reduced hourly rate because you get tips, the grand total of your pay should be at least minimum wage. You are entitled to that. If there is a discrepancy, and you are not earning minimum wage, your employer might have to pay the difference.

There are some situations where an employee receives some tips and earns a reduced hourly rate but they’re required to do a lot of things for which they don’t get tipped. This is unfair and in some cases not allowed under the law. If you have to do a lot of administrative duties, maintenance, opening and closing tasks, meetings, etc., then you might be entitled to minimum wage for all the hours you work.

If you are earning overtime pay, be sure it’s being calculated correctly. It’s not correct to simply multiply your reduced hourly rate by 1.5. Your employer is supposed to pay you 1.5 times minimum wage, minus the tip credit.  If they are doing this wrong, then you may have a claim for unpaid overtime.

Don’t leave money on the table. Talk to an experienced Illinois employment attorney to find out whether you have a case worth pursuing.  We are happy to speak with you for free at any time.

Prime-America

Life insurance policies usually name a beneficiary, which means that the policyholder listed a specific person to receive the distribution of the policy at their death. It can be a straightforward process, and in most cases it’s fairly quick. The proceeds of the life insurance do not need to go through probate, which means that they should be directly distributed to the named beneficiary. There’s no court process of judicial approval required.

Disputes can arise, however, about who the correct beneficiary is or whether the policy can be distributed at all. If you are unable to get the proceeds of a life insurance policy that you believe is yours, you should take legal action sooner rather than later. Get an attorney to help you with this. You should be able to find someone who can work on a contingency basis, which means you won’t have to pay any legal fees until it’s over. And if you don’t win the case, there’s no fee.

In addition to finding an attorney experienced in life insurance issues, locate a copy of the policy. Eventually, it might be necessary to find payment records to prove that the policyholder made all required payments. One reason distribution can be denied is because the policy wasn’t paid or it was cancelled. At least this is what the life insurance company might tell you. Do not take their word for it. They don’t have much to lose by telling you that you can’t collect on the policy, so they might deny your request on a technicality. In some cases, there has been outright fraud. The insurance company makes more money the less it has to pay out. So it’s not a surprise that they are encouraged to pay out as little as possible.

A will or trust does not affect a life insurance policy in most cases, because life insurance is not part of someone’s estate (which goes through probate). There are exceptions, however. If the policy holder did not name a beneficiary, or if a named beneficiary is deceased and there is no contingent or alternate beneficiary listed, then the proceeds of the life insurance policy can be distributed to the estate. If this happens, that money will go through the probate process.

Again, the sooner you act on a life insurance collection problem, the better.  If you’d like our help in finding an attorney who would investigate a case and sue on your behalf, please contact us.  The call is always free and confidential and you don’t pay anything unless you win.

images (5)

One of the most unsettling things about nursing homes is the potential for negligence. By placing a loved one in a facility, you are entrusting strangers with their care. As much as you might research the home, there are no guarantees.

There are things you can do to look out for your family member. Frequent visits, especially at random times, are an important one. Also, know who their doctors are, ask questions about treatment plans and daily routines and know what medications they are taking and why. Asking questions sooner rather than later is always a good idea, as well. The bottom line, however, is that Illinois nursing homes have a legal duty to protect residents. If they breach that duty by acting negligently, or worse by committing some form of abuse against a resident, they can be sued and held responsible.

Common signs of nursing home abuse and neglect include a sudden and unexplained change in the resident’s health or mood. Anger, fear, depression and sadness can indicate that something has happened. Physically, bed sores are a huge red flag that your loved one isn’t being cared for as well as they should. Bed sores develop when someone is in one position for too long, such as sitting in bed for too many hours at a time. Bed sores can worsen quickly, and can even be life threatening.

Medication errors, both over medicating and under medicating, have been a problem in Illinois as well. Nursing home patients are likely to be on multiple medications at any given time. There have been cases of severe overdose, as well as cases where patients were not given a medication as prescribed, resulting in a worsened condition and eventual death. It’s never a bad idea to get the advice of an experienced nursing home abuse and neglect attorney if you have questions about your particular situation.

An Illinois nursing home case can be based on a severe injury or death that was caused by the negligence of the nursing home management or its staff. Cases also can be based on intentional abuse. Keep in mind that in any type of injury lawsuit, you’ll need to focus on what did happen rather than what could have happened. You generally can’t base a lawsuit on a close call, even if it was life threatening. With a close call, the best you can probably do is report the incident and find a safer place for your loved one.

 

images (4)

No one is going to look out for your child like you do, but when you send them to play at a friend’s house, you at least expect that they will be kept safe. When the unthinkable happens and you get a call that your child has been seriously hurt, your first concern is making sure they get the medical attention they need. When the dust settles, you might be wondering if you can hold the other parents responsible if negligence was involved in your child’s injury. After all, you might be facing huge medical bills and permanent disability.

You can sue on behalf of your child for any damages that were caused by the injury, such as medical bills and other financial loss, and even pain and suffering. The value of a case depends a lot on the ongoing treatment needed and whether there is any permanent harm. These cases might be covered by the other party’s homeowner’s insurance.

Whether the other parents or caregivers were legally responsible for the injury depends on what they knew about the thing that hurt your child. If they knew or should have known that your child was in danger and could get hurt, then you might have a case worth pursuing. An aggressive dog, a weapon within child’s reach, an unattended swimming pool or any other dangerous condition in the home or on the property could lead to liability.

These situations are made more complicated by the fact that you know the responsible party personally. You may even be close friends. However, recovering money to pay for your child’s necessary medical care and potential future care is essential. A fall with a potential brain injury could require that your child receive lifetime medical care and support. An experienced injury attorney can help you take the first steps. Again, it might be a claim against the other party’s insurance policy.

Injury attorneys handle these cases on a contingency basis, which means that you don’t have to pay any lawyer fees until your case is over and only if you win. If you don’t win your case, there is no fee. Initial consultations are always free, as well.  Call us at (312) 346-5320 if you would like our help or fill out the contact form to the right.  We help with these cases throughout Illinois and have established a state wide network of aggressive, experienced attorneys who can help you.

 

SW043010InterlockDeviceB&W(av)

A BAIID is a Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device. First-time DUI offenders can get special permission (a Monitoring Device Driving Permit) that lets them drive during their suspension as long as they have one of these devices installed in their vehicle. The device prevents the vehicle from starting if the driver’s blood alcohol content is over a certain amount.

The driver blows into the device, which measures alcohol content and then either allows the car to start, or prevents it from starting if it measures a BAC of .025 or above. The device randomly requires the driver to blow into it again while driving. This prevents an intoxicated person from getting around the device by having a non-intoxicated person help them start the car.

All of the readings on the device are monitored by the Illinois Secretary of State. If you try to start the car and give a breath sample that registers over the limit, you might get a letter from the Secretary of State asking you for an explanation. Depending on your situation, you might not get a letter unless there is a pattern of failures or if your particular reading was above a certain limit.

If you do get a letter, and you don’t respond, or if your explanation is determined to be insufficient, your driver’s license suspension period might be extended by a few months. In some cases you can lose your permit that allows you drive with the monitoring device. Multiple incidents can lead to your car getting impounded or even taken away.

These devices don’t always work perfectly, and people make mistakes. It could be that someone else was using your car. Don’t freak out. You will hear from the secretary of state if they want an explanation. In the meantime, write down any failed readings and call your DUI attorney for reassurance and to see if there’s anything else you need to do while you wait. They can also help you write a letter of explanation to the Secretary of State if necessary.

It might seem like a hassle, but if you need to drive during your Illinois license suspension, a monitoring device is your best bet. If you are caught driving without permission during your suspension, it’s a felony, which in Illinois can include possible jail time, community service and fines up to $25,000. It’s worth it despite the monthly rental and monitoring fees of having the BAIID in your car.

 

images (3)

Alimony, spousal support and maintenance all mean pretty much the same thing, which is the money that one spouse regularly pays to another after a divorce. The reasons, amount, and length of time vary, however.

Why?
The idea behind spousal support is that many times the spouse who earns less, or who doesn’t work at all, does so by choice for the benefit of the household. A classic example is a stay-at-home parent. They are out of the workforce and maybe have been for some time. They simply don’t have the same earning potential (at least in the immediate future) as their spouse. The married couple likely made this choice about how to balance the needs of their family. It was this decision that led the stay-at-home parent to forgo a career, and possibly at the same time, allow the working parent to succeed and move up in his or her job. The concept of spousal support recognizes this common situation. The spouse with no job and less earning potential could find it difficult to meet their basic needs without it.

How much?
The amount of spousal support the court orders is based on the needs of the spouse receiving the support as well as the means of the spouse paying. There is no set amount. The parties can agree on how much the support payments will be, or the court can decide. It’s not a good idea to agree to pay (or receive) a set amount without talking with an experienced divorce attorney. You need to know if the other side is taking advantage of you. Sometimes, temporary spousal support is ordered while a divorce is in progress.

How long?
Spousal support can go on for a couple of years, or forever. It depends on the spouses’ ages, needs, health, ability to work, and the length of the marriage. Spousal support always ends, however, if the spouse receiving payments gets remarried. The length of spousal support can be negotiated. Don’t trust your spouse’s attorney to give you any advice. It’s not their job, and in fact it’s unethical for them to advise you while having your spouse as their client. Hire your own attorney – someone you can trust to work hard for your best interests.

Is this confusing? It can be. If you would like a free consultation with one of our experienced attorneys, fill out the form on the right side of the page or call us at (312) 346-5320.

atlanta-qdro-attorney

QDRO stands for Qualified Domestic Relations Order. It has to do with splitting up retirement assets in a divorce. The law in Illinois says that retirement plans are the joint property of both spouses, at least the portion that was earned or acquired during the marriage.

Retirement plans are marital assets, and in a divorce, all marital property is to be divided equitably. If the spouses can’t agree, then the judge will decide how to divide things. In general, it doesn’t matter whose name is on marital property. Real estate, retirement plans, pensions, bank accounts – if it was earned or acquired during the marriage, then it’s marital property. On the other hand, some stuff can be a spouse’s separate property, but it has to have been earned or acquired before marriage. Certain gifts, as well as inheritances, also remain a spouse’s separate property in most cases.

Retirement plans, including 401ks, IRAs and pensions, are difficult to divide, since they aren’t like cash. Their current value might be unclear. They’re also complicated by the fact that they might be partially separate property (the part earned before the marriage) and partially marital property (the part earned since the marriage). This is where the QDRO comes in.

Experts and accountants are often used to research the value of a retirement plan, especially something like a pension that pays out a certain amount at a set time in the future. It’s not easy to put a current value on it without an expert. Once it’s decided how the assets will be divided, the QDRO is an order from the court telling the retirement account administrator exactly how to divide the account, usually by creating separate accounts in each spouse’s name.

There are other options. If spouses have fairly equal retirement plans, then they might decide to each take their own. Even if they aren’t equal, they can agree to this if they wish. If you don’t want to split the retirement plan, then other property can be divided in a way that offsets the value of the retirement plan – Spouse A keeps his or her retirement plan, and Spouse B gets the house, for example.

The main thing to remember is that you shouldn’t rely on an informal or partially-formed agreement when it comes to getting your half or share of a retirement plan or pension. And don’t fall into the trap of putting off the QDRO until after the divorce. At that point, there isn’t as much or an incentive to resolve things and you might have to go back to court to make it happen.

If you are dealing with this issue or any other Illinois legal issue, we are happy to help you at any time.

Photo-on-2012-11-06-at-08.25-2

It’s no surprise that you can lose your license if you drink and drive, but the details can be confusing because in Illinois there are two different ways in which you can lose your license. There is what’s called a “statutory summary suspension” from the secretary of state, and then there potentially is a separate license suspension or revocation if you are found guilty of driving under the influence.

Statutory summary suspension

The main thing to know about Illinois’ statutory summary suspension is that it’s automatic. If you are arrested and a blood alcohol test at the police station confirms that you were intoxicated beyond the legal limit (.08), the secretary of state automatically suspends your license for six months. If you refuse the test, you will get an automatic one-year suspension. These are for first offenses. For a second offense, the statutory summary suspension for testing above the legal limit is one year, and for refusing testing it’s three years. There is no penalty for refusing a field sobriety test at the side of the road.

A statutory summary suspension does not begin right away. It actually starts 45 days after your arrest. The suspension is not based on guilt or innocence. It’s an administrative and automatic penalty for failing a chemical test or refusing a chemical test. You can, however, go to court and ask the judge to cancel your suspension by proving that your arrest was unlawful or based on some other reason why your license should not have been suspended.

Revocation

If you are convicted of a DUI, your license can be revoked for a year or more. Unlike the suspension described above, a license revocation is a criminal penalty that applies if you are proven guilty. If you receive court supervision as the outcome after a DUI, you may not face revocation. For second, third or further offenses, license revocation can last anywhere from five years to life.

If you drive on a suspended or revoked license you can face felony charges. After the period of suspension, you have to pay a fee for reinstatement. After revocation, you may have to go to a hearing. Be certain that your license is properly reinstated before you start driving again.

 Other things to keep in mind: If your driving privileges are suspended or revoked in Illinois, then they are suspended and revoked in other states, as well. Also, the above rules and timelines can be different for drivers who are under 21. First-time offenders might be eligible to drive during suspension if they get a monitoring device.

Written by Michael Helfand

Free Case Review
From Our Attorneys

Archives