Find The Best Attorney For Your Case
(312) 346-5320 or (800) 517-1614
Free Consultations - 24/7
No Appointment Needed, Just Call

Illinois Family Law

If you read our website, you know that we highly recommend that when you hire an attorney in Illinois, you choose one who has a very narrow practice focus.  Illinois attorneys can’t legally call themselves specialists, but you want someone who isn’t a jack of all trades lawyer, but instead just handles the type of case you have.  So a “specialist” even if we can’t call them that.

When it comes to choosing a divorce attorney in Illinois, you not only want someone in your corner who is experienced and will fight for you, but you need to make sure that they understand the issues you are facing.  Some law firms are good at divorces when one spouse owns a business. Others have had success with child custody disputes.

Most firms who focus on family law will also deal with substance abuse in marriages because it comes up a lot. The question for you is, are they paying appropriate attention to this potentially devastating problem.

If your husband/wife is an alcoholic or abusing drugs it can cause so many problems. First and foremost is that you don’t want them to be alone with your children and certainly not taking the kids anywhere in a car. As a client you can’t just hope to prevent this, but instead need a lawyer who knows how to properly present a motion that shows this concern and knows how to prove your allegations are true. Often this will mean getting an order of protection on behalf of the kids.  Other times it’s handled in a straight custody hearing where we argue that any visitation should be supervised.  It’s all about knowing how to win and showing that you have won in the past.  You don’t want an attorney to have one of their first experiences handling this problem on your case.

Beyond the kids, there is also the issue of the spouse who blows all of the family funds on their habit and runs up large debts.  These are marital funds and even if they are taken away via reckless spending, they some times can be recovered as well.  For example, if you have a $100,000.00 401k, typically you and your spouse would split it 50/50 if it was all earned during the marriage.  But if your spouse spent $20,000.00 on a cocaine habit, you might get a credit for that wasteful spending when it comes time to divide the 401k.

Other things can be done such as drug testing to prove your allegations are true.  This all starts though with an attorney in your corner who knows what they are doing.  We can’t call them specialists, but that’s what you need.

If you would like our help in finding the right lawyer for your case or just have questions, call us for free at (312) 346-5320 or fill out our contact form and we’ll call you.

With the holidays upon us, more people in Illinois are thinking about divorce than any other time of the year.  The holidays have a way of making people realize that they aren’t happy in their marriage and with 2016 right around the corner, many want to get a fresh start.

The very funny comedian, Louis CK, has been through a divorce and I love his joke in the picture. He’s right when he says that “no happy marriage ends in divorce.”  You might be happy in your relationship and get blindsided by a cheating spouse, but the truth is that if they are cheating on you, it’s not a happy marriage.

From my standpoint, the best part of the joke is that it has a real lesson which is that if you can accept that you aren’t in a happy marriage then you can accept that it’s best for you to get divorced.  Of course that’s a lot easier said than done, but the ones who have that ability can start making rational decisions instead of emotional ones.  You won’t be trying to get back at your spouse, you’ll be trying to get a result that you will be satisfied with and move on with your life.

Whenever someone calls us for advice on a divorce or looking for an attorney referral, the first thing we tell them is that they need to get a game plan together.  By meeting with an experienced family law attorney you can make sure you are thinking about EVERY issue that needs to be handled to get you to the end point in your case.  You also need to not just worry about what you want to happen right now (e.g. custody of the kids), but also a year from now (religion of the kids, where you want to live), five years from now (what are you going to be doing for work and does that impact your case, what will happen if you re-marry) and ten years from now (possibly planning for college expenses or selling the marital home).

It’s not easy to game plan when you are only thinking about revenge or the hurt you are feeling or simply trying to hold it all together.  We get that.  That’s why having a good attorney in your corner is important as it can take a lot of the pressure off of you.  But it’s still on you to focus on your goals and the Louis CK joke, while funny, should help you realize that.

That’s not to say you are going to finish with a divorce and be happy or even enjoy the divorce process.  But you can make it go smoothly and start getting on the path back to happiness.  If you’d like our help in making that happen, please call us at (312) 346-5320.

Probably the most common area of law that we help with is Illinois divorce law.  Plain and simple there are just more of those cases than any other area of law.  We help people find the right attorney no matter what their situation is, but divorce is clearly the most common.

While some divorces are clean breaks, many involve hurt feelings and people acting on emotion instead of logic. Because of this, crazy things can happen that can, well, drive you crazy.

The #1 problem is from soon to be ex’s acting like a jerk and doing whatever they can to get under your skin.  A good lawyer can’t always do something about that, but we can try.

The #2 problem though is created by lawyers.  A recent caller to my office is typical of the problems a bad attorney can create in this situation.  My caller is a stay at home mom with three kids.  She and her husband both want the divorce, although he moved a little faster than she did and got a lawyer.

The lawyer had her served with a petition for dissolution of marriage, e.g. a divorce petition.  She didn’t know it was coming, but it didn’t rattle her.  What did cause a problem were the contents of the petition.  In it, the lawyer asked that she move out of the maritial home, give him full custody of the kids with no visitation for her, pay him child support, pay him his lawyer fees, give up any rights to the joint bank account or other marital property and have her pay him maintenance.  Mind you that one of the kids has special needs, she’s been a stay at home mom for 15 years and while she did a couple years of college, he’s a medical doctor pulling in a mid six figure salary.

Needless to say, she was stunned and then pissed off and then a little bit frightened.  Her husband gave her no indication that this was coming and beyond that, he hardly spends any time with the kids.  She called me and was ready to go to war.

We’ve been helping people find the best lawyer for their case for almost 15 years via our state wide network of experienced, successful law firms.  The lawyers we recommend fight for their clients and they are people who we as attorneys would hire ourselves.

We don’t just recommend lawyers though, we also provide free legal guidance.  Part of being a good attorney is helping take the emotion out of the situation and getting a client to be goal focused.

What I explained to this caller is that her husband clearly has a terrible attorney.  Basically the lawyer presented what would be an extreme best case scenario.  Lawyers without skills will use this tactic so they can have a lot of room to negotiate on a case and act as if they are really compromising when they give up on some of their demands.  It’s a pretty amateur move.  It would be similar to the agent for a baseball player who hit .250 the year before asking the team to pay him $30 million a year so he won’t look as unreasonable when he asks for $10 million a year.  I can tell you that it doesn’t work in sports and doesn’t work on good attorneys.

I was able to talk this very nice woman off the ledge and let her know that based on what she told me, she’ll actually end up getting just about everything her husband’s lawyer was asking for if this goes to court.  It’s clear that either his attorney is inexperienced or is just trying to create a battle to run up some huge bill.  It’s really his client who will be hurt by this.

These types of motions aren’t much different than when your ex says something like, “You’ll never see the kids again!” It’s really easy to let them get you riled up, but you have to take emotion out of the equation and remember that they aren’t the Judge and you certainly shouldn’t take legal advice from them.

If your ex or any opponent in a legal case is making you insane, the best advice I can give you is to relax, take a step back and put your case in the hands of someone who will fight for you, but isn’t going to make emotional decisions.  Of course helping you find that person is what we do better than anyone else.  Fill out our contact form to the right if you’d like our help.  It’s free and confidential.

My grandmother was a wonderful woman who as she got older tended to repeat herself a lot. That was alright with me because she was adorable and mostly repeated things that made her laugh. Often this involved sayings that included her favorite, “It takes two to tango!”

I think of her and this saying every time someone calls me and wants a divorce lawyer referral to someone that knows about the mediation process or simply wants to do a collaborative divorce where they figure things out with the help of a mediator.

I’m a big fan of the mediation process and in fact I used to be a licensed mediator. Whenever my kids are acting up I try to use mediation tactics to diffuse the situation.

But my grandma was right, it does take two to tango. If you want to mediate and your spouse does not or is not giving it a good faith effort, then mediation is a waste of time.  It only works well when two people want to use mediation to come to a resolution or at least try to.  I did a ton of mediations back in the day where it was obvious that one party didn’t want to be there (often a Judge made them) and like a child throwing a tantrum, nothing I could say would turn around their behavior.

On the flip side, if you both can mediate in good faith it can save you a lot of money on lawyer fees.  That said, you’d be crazy not to have a lawyer in your corner either at the mediation or at least before and after to make sure of two things: 1. That you are talking about every issue that needs to be talked about.  You don’t want to settle a case and then end up back in court because you didn’t agree on what religion a child would be raised for example or because you didn’t divide up a pension. 2. That you aren’t screwing yourself over by agreeing to things that would never happen if you went to court such as not getting any child support if you are the primary custodian of the kids or having your parental rights terminated.

Those things can happen if you really want them to, but most attorneys would never advise it.  Getting a lawyer involved is about educating yourself and covering your backside. If you make a mistake it will cost way more in the long run if you have to go to court to try and fix it.

In general though while divorce sucks and nobody likes the process, if it can be amicable, that’s the best way to do it.  But there’s a big difference between “we both want to get divorced” and “we can work together to solve EVERY issue that needs to be solved.”  It’s great if you can use a mediator, but there’s no shame if you can’t.

When it comes to awarding custody in an Illinois child custody case, the number one factor is the best interests of the child. This sounds obvious, but these exact words are written into Illinois law. The best interest of the child is always the main concern of the judge. In some cases this means physical safety, where one parent may be abusive, but in many cases it’s deciding which environment would provide the best and most stable home for the child.  It’s assumed by many that the mother will get the kids and the Dad will get almost nothing and that does happen, but it’s not the law.

Instead a Judge looks at the best interests of the child.

So how does the court know what’s in a child’s best interest? The law includes several factors for the court to consider. No one factor is considered most or least important; all will be applied to determine the best interests of the child. The judge has an important job in this respect – each case is different and the factors may have different weight depending on the circumstances. For this very reason, it’s extremely important to have an attorney on your side who knows how these cases usually go, what judges tend to care most about, and how to prove that you are the best person to have custody.

Here is the list of factors that can be taken into consideration by the court in an Illinois child custody case:

  1. the wishes of the child’s parent or parents as to his or her custody
  2. the wishes of the child as to his or her custody
  3. the interaction and interrelationship of the child with his parent or parents, his siblings and any other person who may significantly affect the child’s best interest
  4. the child’s adjustment to his home, school and community
  5. the mental and physical health of all individuals involved
  6. the physical violence or threat of physical violence by the child’s potential custodian, whether directed against the child or directed against another person
  7. the occurrence of ongoing abuse as defined in Section 103 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986, whether directed against the child or directed against another person
  8. the willingness and ability of each parent to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the other parent and the child

If, when examining these criteria, none of the factors clearly point to one parent or the other, the court usually will look to the parent who can provide the most stable environment for the child. If this is how your case will be decided, you will want to make the best argument possible. We believe having the right attorney can make a big difference.  Often the Judge will appoint a Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) to help them make the decision.  Hiring an attorney who knows the GAL’s well can be the difference between winning and losing.

If you have any questions about Illinois child custody and family law, or if would like a referral to a family law attorney, please do not hesitate to contact us. All calls and emails are free and confidential.

See also: Chicago Father’s Rights Attorneys

child s 11.10

Parents have a financial obligation to support their children when they are minors. Court-ordered child support almost always continues until the age of 18. However, there are some circumstances in which a child might need continued support beyond the age of majority.

Illinois law allows a court to order parents to support their children past the age of 18. A parent seeking this type of support – called non-minor support – can petition the court and make a formal request. Child support that is extended or awarded beyond age 18 is decided on a case-by-case basis, but the law mentions a few specific scenarios.

The first is when a child turns 18 while still in high school. If this is the case, the law allows support to continue until graduation or until the child turns 19. Even though the child is technically not a minor, he or she is likely living the same life they were at 17 and is in need of the same support from his or her parents until graduation. Don’t assume, however, that your child support order covers this post-majority time period unless specifically stated.

A second justification for non-minor support is for a physically or mentally disabled child. In these cases, support can continue indefinitely. This is for children who are not emancipated. If you want support for a non-minor disabled child, you can petition the court any time, even after their 18th birthday.

And finally, a very common basis for non-minor support is educational expenses to pay for college. When a child is headed to college (or professional or other training), a judge can order both parents, and the child, to share the costs of continued education. The court generally cannot order payment of educational expenses beyond a bachelor’s degree, however.

Illinois judges are given discretion when deciding who pays and how much, but an order for shared expenses is likely unless one party is facing extreme financial hardship. A judge will consider a range of relevant factors, including the financial resources of both parents, the standard of living the child would have enjoyed had the parents not divorced, as well as the financial resources of the child and the child’s academic performance. A judge may consider additional factors that are deemed relevant.

The shared educational expenses can include tuition, room and board, books and supplies, fees, transportation, health insurance and other reasonable college expenses. The support order can include a requirement that the child remain in good standing as a full-time student in order for the support to continue. Support payments can be made to either parent, to the student or directly to the school.

Keep in mind that non-minor support is not automatic and it’s not required by law. Oral promises and informal plans, even when well intended, are bound to change as the years go by. The relationship between the parents might be amicable at the time of divorce, when decisions about child support are being made, but that can change by the time college comes around.

You can go to court to request non-minor support before your child turns 18. If you and the other parent can agree to the continued support, including how much and for which expenses, then it makes things easier. If not, the judge will decide.

Is this confusing?  It can be.  Contact us if you’d like to speak to one of our attorneys for free and in confidence for legal guidance and/or a child support attorney referral.

prenup 11.3.14

Married couples share a lot of things without thinking much about it. You probably have some property that you think of as your own, some you think of as your spouse’s, and much that you acquired together and think of as shared. However, when it comes to dividing property in divorce, state law often steps in and defines these categories for you. And it might not be what you expect.

In Illinois, the law distinguishes “marital property,” which belongs to both spouses, from “non-marital property,” which is a spouse’s separate property. The distinction is important because courts have the power to divide marital property in a divorce. While courts often divide marital property 50-50, it’s not always the case. You could end up with less than half. Non-marital property, on the other hand, will not be divided.

The basic rule is that anything earned or acquired during the marriage is considered marital property. This includes each spouse’s 401k. It also includes bank accounts, investments, houses, cars, etc. A few things are considered non-marital property, including property owned prior to the marriage, gifts and inheritances.

So, an inheritance is non-marital property, even if it was inherited during the marriage. It’s a good start, but there’s a big catch. If you aren’t careful, you could unintentionally alter the status of your inheritance and transform it into marital property. The court is likely to assume that property is marital unless you can prove otherwise.

The key is keeping your inheritance separate. When non-marital property is co-mingled with marital property, you risk losing it as your own. Illinois law can consider it a gift to the marriage and therefore marital property. Don’t combine your inheritance with your marital property or your spouse’s property. If it’s cash or securities, keep it in a separate account. If it’s a house or a piece of land, make sure the title remains in your name, and be wary of using marital property (money) to improve the property.

In addition to keeping your inheritance separate, consider signing a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement. You can use a document like this to define the ownership of property. If you and your spouse sign something saying that your inherited money or property goes to you in the event of divorce, then you have extra assurance that it will end up that way.

We recognize that many people don’t worry about keeping their separate property separate because they do not intend to divorce. This could be a mistake. Tackling these issues doesn’t have to be personal, and it doesn’t have to be an insult to your marriage. It’s just good common sense to plan ahead and protect an inheritance that was left to you.

This can be complex. If you have questions or need to be pointed in the right direction, please contact us at any time.

See also: Courts In Illinois Are Closed, But You Have Options

MEDi 10.06

Mediation can be an efficient way to settle your divorce case, if it’s right for you. A mediator is an unbiased third party who meets with you and your spouse to reach an agreement on the various aspects of divorce. The job of the mediator is to suggest solutions and help bring the two sides closer to agreement.

If you and your soon-to-be ex can barely even speak without arguing, you might think mediation isn’t an option for you. It could be worth a try anyway. Mediation is confidential and non-binding. It cannot be brought up in court if the mediation fails and you end up bringing your case before a judge instead. If you try and it doesn’t work, then you can still go to court and have the judge hear your case. If mediation does work, and you reach an agreement, that agreement is then submitted to the judge before it becomes final.

In Illinois, mediation is not required for every divorce, although the judge can always make it a requirement in your case. Mediation is required, however, in cases (including divorce cases) that involve child custody or visitation issues that cannot be resolved. In fact, mediation is required whenever child custody is an issue, even if the parents were never married. After a case involving custody or visitation is filed, the court will then order mediation, unless there is good reason mediation is not appropriate. In cases of domestic violence, for example, mediation will likely not be ordered. The same is true in cases where there is substance abuse or mental illness.

You can hire a private mediator, or go through the courts. Some mediators are lawyers with experience in family law cases; others do not have a law license but should have completed a training course. In child custody and visitation cases, the mediator will keep the best interests of the child or children in mind. The same is true for cases involving a request to move a child to another state. In divorce cases, the mediator’s job is to help both sides reach a compromise that they can both agree to. Even if the mediation itself is mandatory, you are not required to come to an agreement. And any agreement you do come to is not binding. When you submit an agreement to the judge and the judge signs it as an official order, then your agreement is binding.

The benefits of mediation in divorce include saving money, time and even stress. Going though litigation and approaching conflict from the extremes typically involves higher legal fees. And the process can take much longer, with delays caused every time there is a disagreement. Not every case can be resolved in mediation, and in those cases, going to court with an attorney and taking an aggressive approach might be necessary to protect your interests. But because mediation is not binding, and arguably gives you more control over the outcome, there’s a good argument for at least trying.

Even if you predict that you will end up in mediation, consult with an experienced Illinois divorce and custody lawyer, too. You’ll still need someone to make sure your interests are protected. Your mediator should not be giving you legal advice. Your attorney will review any agreement you come to in mediation and can suggest changes and help you understand every aspect of the agreement. Don’t wait until after an agreement is reached to talk to a lawyer.

If you have questions about how mediation might work in your case, let us know. There are pros and cons to pretty much everything in life, including mediation. If you think you might find yourself in family court in the near future, learn about your options.

169381-425x354-illinois-divorce

 

According to the CDC, there is a divorce in the United States every 36 seconds. That amounts to hundreds of thousands of divorces every year. This might not be surprising, given the well-known statistic that 50% of marriages end in divorce.

Here are some lesser-known stats on marriage in America…

The more times you try it, the less likely it is to last. Second and third marriages are more likely to end in divorce than first marriages. According to statistics, about 40% of first marriages end in divorce; 60% of second marriages and 70-75% of third marriages.

Divorce rates also change depending on your age. Divorce rates are highest for those in their early 20s and significantly lower for those in their late 30s, for example.

You are more likely to get divorced if:

– You don’t have kids
– Your parents were not happily married
– You got married before your 25th birthday
– You lived together before you are married
– You didn’t go to college
– You live in a more conservative state
– You live in Oklahoma, Arkansas or Alaska, which have the highest divorce rates in the country.

Some other interesting facts: Divorce, custody and support stats are different for men vs. women. Women file for divorce in about 2/3 of the cases. Mothers are more likely to get a support award, and they also are more likely to default on a support obligation. The majority of children with divorced parents live with their mother.

Celebrity marriages and divorces don’t seem to fit the mold. Instead, they often take it to the extreme. Take Britney Spears’ divorce after a brief 2-day marriage to a friend, or the long list of celebrity divorce settlements topping $100 million. Mel Gibson reportedly paid his ex $425 million in their divorce.

In the U.S., the average timing for divorce is 8 years into the marriage. The average time before remarriage is 3 years. No one gets married thinking it will happen to them, but as statistics show, it happens every day.

spousal 10

Illinois already has a formula, or guideline amounts, for determining child support. These are written into the law. But there is no similar guideline for spousal support, which has led to a lot of discrepancy in what gets awarded. At the beginning of next year, however, a new Illinois law goes into effect, and it will set a formula for determining spousal support.

Illinois technically calls it spousal “maintenance.” It’s the same thing as spousal support or alimony – an amount paid by one spouse to the other, during and/or after divorce. A typical situation involves a spouse who stayed home with children, or for other reasons benefiting the family, instead of pursuing a career. One purpose of maintenance is to support that spouse while they get back into the workforce

Up until now, the amount of maintenance awarded to a spouse has varied considerably. Sometimes, the divorcing couple would agree to an amount. Other times, it was argued in court and the judge would decide. Judges have had a set of legal factors to guide them, but there was no formula and therefore the results varied widely. Now, beginning January 1, 2015, judges will have something more concrete to follow.

The new maintenance law is based on the gross income of the parties and the length of the marriage. The gross income determines the amount of the support owed after the marriage is dissolved, and the length of the marriage determines the duration of the payments. The law only applies to couples whose gross combined income is less than $250,000, although judges could presumably apply it to couples with higher income if they found it appropriate.

Amount

The amount of maintenance is 30% of the payor’s gross income minus 20% of the payee’s gross income. So if Spouse A makes $100,000 and Spouse B makes $20,000, then the maintenance amount paid to Spouse B would be $26,000 (30% of $100,000 minus 20% of $20,000).

There is a limit. The amount you get from the above formula, when added to the gross income of the payee, can’t exceed 40% of the couple’s combined gross income. So in this example, the maintenance of $26,000 plus payee’s income of $20,000 comes to a total of $46,000. This is less than 40% of their combined gross income of $120,000, which is $48,000, so no adjustments would need to be made.

The law would come up with a maintenance amount of $26,000 in this case. The general goal, in less technical terms, is that the bigger the income gap, the higher the payment to the spouse who earns less.

Duration

The amount of maintenance determined above is per year. In order to know how long payments will go on, you take the length of the marriage and multiply it by a factor, according to the following schedule:

0-5 years = .20

5-10 years = .40

10-15 years = .60

15-20 years = .80

If the marriage is for more than 20 years, the court may order permanent maintenance or maintenance for a time equal to the length of the marriage.

This formula isn’t automatically used in every divorce case. First, the court must determine whether maintenance is even appropriate in a given case. Then, they can apply the formula. It’s important to know that the law gives judges the option of not using the formula, but they have to give a reason why they didn’t. In other words, judges still have discretion.

A major benefit of set guidelines is predictability and consistency. It helps attorneys advise their clients about likely outcomes. It can save legal fees by making the support amount fairly certain rather than a wide-open issue, which takes more time for lawyers and judges. On the other hand, a strict guideline can’t possibly make sense in every case. It will be interesting to see how and when judges use their discretion once the new guidelines become law.

father r 10.01.14

We get this question a lot. The idea that fathers have rights that are different from those of mothers is a misunderstanding that has been created by the way some family law attorneys advertise. These lawyers try to get clients by suggesting they specialize in “father’s rights,” which makes fathers think they need to hire that type of attorney. It’s just a marketing gimmick.

There is no Illinois law that says a father gets more or less time with his children than their mother. (Note that we are talking about cases where paternity is not at issue.) What you really need if you are facing a custody battle is a great custody attorney. This is far more important than whether the attorney claims to specialize in the rights of one group over the other.

Mothers may have an advantage in some custody cases, but it’s because of the circumstances within their family rather than anything written into the law. We’ve seen plenty of cases where it’s the other way around. What makes the biggest difference in many cases is whether a parent is represented by an experienced custody attorney.

In the eyes of the law, each parent has equal rights. It is up to the court to determine which parent gets custody or if custody is shared. The court’s main goal is to do what’s in the best interest of the child or children. That’s the law. Your attorney should focus on proving that you are the best parent to take care of your kids.

So the answer to the question “What are a father’s rights in an Illinois child custody case?” is that they are the same as any parent’s rights. You have a right to make decisions that affect how your child is raised, and you have a right to spend time with your child.

It doesn’t have to be left up to the judge. If both mother and father agree on a custody and visitation arrangement, and the judge approves it, the outcome can be up to the parents. While we believe mutual agreement is a good way to go, we don’t recommend doing so without the advice of a lawyer who is yours and yours alone. Do not take advice from the other parent or their attorney.

uncontested-divorce

No one wants an expensive divorce. We get a lot of calls from people looking for low-cost options. Many wonder if they even need an attorney at all.

Illinois has something called a Joint Simplified Divorce. If you have a fairly simple situation and meet the financial requirement, you might qualify. You can get a Joint Simplified Divorce if you have been married for less than 8 years, you have no children or real estate, and you make less than $35,000/year combined. You also have to agree on everything, such as how your personal property will be divided.

Court costs include a filing fee and the cost of serving your spouse with the divorce papers. You may be able to have fees waived if you can show that you have limited financial resources.

Even if you don’t qualify for a Joint Simplified Divorce, your divorce will be more simple, and less expensive, if you and your spouse agree on everything. Don’t forget to consider child support, custody and visitation; property division; division of all assets and debts; retirement plans; and spousal maintenance (alimony). If you and your spouse don’t agree on getting a divorce in the first place, or disagree about any of the issues listed above, your divorce is considered a contested divorce. A contested divorce will take more time, and as a result, it will be more expensive.

We almost always recommend hiring a divorce attorney, especially if your spouse has an attorney. The final agreement you come to can have a significant effect on your future, not to mention the future of your children if you have any. In other words, the stakes can be high and having a lawyer gives you a better chance at a good outcome. Be especially careful – and don’t skip getting legal advice – if your situation involves significant assets, such as a retirement account (yours or your spouse’s), if you have children, if you need financial support from your spouse or if you own a business.

little_girl_reading_600x399

If you read my blog, you know that I am not a believer in “father’s rights” type marketing strategies.  It’s the stuff of snake oil salesmen in my opinion.  If you care about your clients then you do whatever you can for them.

I do think some laws are unfair though. The biggest violator has to be Illinois child support laws.

What is wrong is that the amount you pay or receive does not reflect in any way the amount of time you spend with your child or what you do for them financially.  If you are paying support for one kid, you’ll pay 20% of your net take home pay.  Two kids is 28%.  Three is 32% and so on.

But if you have your kids 50% of the time (man or woman) and your ex has the other 50%, one of you is still going to pay child support to the other.  How is that fair?  What if the Dad has the kids four days/nights and the Mom has them three?  Should the Mom have to still pay the full amount?  It’s not right.

It’s definitely not a male/female issue.  People get screwed equally.  It’s not just based on the time spent with the kids.  How about the fact that you can be making $35,000 a year and your ex could make $400,000 a year and you’d still have to pay them child support if they have primary custody.  I know Illinois can be a screwed up state, but that is ridiculous.

This happens because “this is how it’s always been done.”  What made sense 50 years ago doesn’t necessarily make sense now.  And to change this wouldn’t require more litigation, it would just require more organization and a willingness to look at what is really going on.  Here’s what I’d propose:

-If your ex earns more than four times or $100,000 more than you do, your child support payments can’t exceed half of the current statutory minimums (so if you have two kids, you’d pay 14%).
-If you can prove that you spend at least 40% of the non-school hours with your child, then you should be eligible for the same deduction.  Perhaps this would encourage some listless parents to spend more time with their kids.
-If you lose a job or have a reduction in salary, let’s create an easier way to modify your payments without having to hire a lawyer and go to court.  And if you get a raise, you should be required to report it within 30 days for modification of be subject to having to pay back the increase retroactively.
-And given how many employers pay their employees cash under the table, enabling those parents from having to pay child support, I’d be in favor of allowing the other parent to sue the employer because their breaking of the law is hurting the child.
-I’d have child support issues handled by Arbitrators, not Judges, if that was the only issue in the case.  That way it would take less time and money to get a result.  Put both parties under oath, ask them questions about their wages and go from there.  These hearings should not take nearly as long as they currently do.

While we are at it, let’s address college support payments.  In an ideal world, parents would be able to afford to send their kids to college.  I certainly hope to do so for my kids.  If my wife and I stay married then it will be up to us as to whether or not to pay all or part of their college expenses.  But if we were to get divorced then I’d be forced to do so.  That makes no sense at all.  A much better idea would be to make sure that 529 college savings plans can’t be touched until the child is either in school or has turned 20 and has not yet gone to college.  But if you never saved for college while you were married, why do you get forced to pay it once divorced?

This system wouldn’t be perfect.  Nothing is.  But the goal should always be to make our laws better and fairer.

custody

 

I would never call myself a “fathers’ rights lawyer” or “mothers’ rights lawyer.”  I believe the firms that do that are really just trying to scare you in to hiring them.  A lawyer either fights for you or they don’t.  Tricking somebody in to thinking you have a passion for your work isn’t the way to do things.

But I do call it like I see it.  Sometimes that means telling a client that they are wrong even though it’s not what they want to hear.  Other times it involves pointing out a law that is incredibly unfair, even if it makes me sound like I’m just stumping for fathers.

That said, the law in Illinois with respect to voluntary acknowledgement of paternity is terrible and needs to be changed.  If a man signs the birth certificate of a child and acknowledges that he is the father, he has 60 days in which he can rescind that.  So if you’ve been dating a girl for two years and she gets pregnant, if you sign assuming you are the father, that means that you are legally the father.  This is true if (as happened to a caller to my office) five years later you have a paternity test done and learn that you aren’t really the biological Dad.  So you can end up paying child support for a child that isn’t yours.

Once sixty days has passed, the only way to vacate signing is to file a 2-1401 petition on the limited grounds of fraud, duress, or material mistake of fact.  That’s a lot harder than it sounds and it must be filed within two years from the date you originally signed.  Duress would be something like a gun was placed to your head.  Fraud could be a faked paternity test.

The safest thing to do is never sign in the first place without a paternity test.  That doesn’t sound very romantic, but sometimes the smart thing isn’t romantic or even easy.

Beyond this all though, the law needs to be changed.  Why should you have to support a child that isn’t yours?  It literally makes no sense and I can’t think of one argument in favor of it.  I have no problem not letting the mistaken Dad recoup the money he’s laid out over the years by mistake.  As I said, you should get a paternity test so that’s on him.  But once you do learn the truth, you should be off the hook.

In the worst examples I’ve seen some men have to support a child that isn’t theirs while the real father lives with the kid and doesn’t contribute hardly anything.  It’s just wrong and needs to stop.  We should have the ability to take laws that make no sense and change them.  This one needs to be at the top of the list.

download (2)

The best-case scenario is when you already have a court order in place. We’re talking about a court order for child support, which is a court document that tells one parent what they must pay the other parent for the support of their child or children. If you have one of these, then you have a head start and you can go after the other parent for past-due payments.

You can bring the other parent back to court to force payments. Wage garnishment and other tactics can be used if they continue to refuse to pay. The good news is that it’s really never too late if you have a court order. There isn’t a deadline in Illinois for collecting unpaid child support. Interest on unpaid support should be included, as well.

If you don’t have a court order, you’ll be asking for retroactive child support, which is harder to get. If your child is still a minor, you can get an order for current and future child support, however. Get the help of a child support lawyer in order to give yourself and advantage. Good legal advice also ensures that you avoid pitfalls.

Adult children often wonder if they can collect past-due child support that their parent never paid. Unfortunately, the child themselves cannot collect this, even as an adult. It’s ordered to be paid to the parent, so that parent must be the one who goes after it. It might not be too late to collect, but we tell these individuals that they have to convince their parent to get involved.

Potential obstacles include a parent who has disappeared, or a parent who is unemployed and/or claims to have no income or assets. If the parent who should be paying child support is claiming that they can’t afford it, and you suspect that they are lying, an experienced attorney can help you find out the truth.

Don’t put your ability to collect child support at risk by making private agreements for payment with your ex. And don’t let them off the hook if they haven’t paid. You need to protect your interest – which is really your child’s interest – and maintain your leverage.

images (3)

Alimony, spousal support and maintenance all mean pretty much the same thing, which is the money that one spouse regularly pays to another after a divorce. The reasons, amount, and length of time vary, however.

Why?
The idea behind spousal support is that many times the spouse who earns less, or who doesn’t work at all, does so by choice for the benefit of the household. A classic example is a stay-at-home parent. They are out of the workforce and maybe have been for some time. They simply don’t have the same earning potential (at least in the immediate future) as their spouse. The married couple likely made this choice about how to balance the needs of their family. It was this decision that led the stay-at-home parent to forgo a career, and possibly at the same time, allow the working parent to succeed and move up in his or her job. The concept of spousal support recognizes this common situation. The spouse with no job and less earning potential could find it difficult to meet their basic needs without it.

How much?
The amount of spousal support the court orders is based on the needs of the spouse receiving the support as well as the means of the spouse paying. There is no set amount. The parties can agree on how much the support payments will be, or the court can decide. It’s not a good idea to agree to pay (or receive) a set amount without talking with an experienced divorce attorney. You need to know if the other side is taking advantage of you. Sometimes, temporary spousal support is ordered while a divorce is in progress.

How long?
Spousal support can go on for a couple of years, or forever. It depends on the spouses’ ages, needs, health, ability to work, and the length of the marriage. Spousal support always ends, however, if the spouse receiving payments gets remarried. The length of spousal support can be negotiated. Don’t trust your spouse’s attorney to give you any advice. It’s not their job, and in fact it’s unethical for them to advise you while having your spouse as their client. Hire your own attorney – someone you can trust to work hard for your best interests.

Is this confusing? It can be. If you would like a free consultation with one of our experienced attorneys, fill out the form on the right side of the page or call us at (312) 346-5320.

atlanta-qdro-attorney

QDRO stands for Qualified Domestic Relations Order. It has to do with splitting up retirement assets in a divorce. The law in Illinois says that retirement plans are the joint property of both spouses, at least the portion that was earned or acquired during the marriage.

Retirement plans are marital assets, and in a divorce, all marital property is to be divided equitably. If the spouses can’t agree, then the judge will decide how to divide things. In general, it doesn’t matter whose name is on marital property. Real estate, retirement plans, pensions, bank accounts – if it was earned or acquired during the marriage, then it’s marital property. On the other hand, some stuff can be a spouse’s separate property, but it has to have been earned or acquired before marriage. Certain gifts, as well as inheritances, also remain a spouse’s separate property in most cases.

Retirement plans, including 401ks, IRAs and pensions, are difficult to divide, since they aren’t like cash. Their current value might be unclear. They’re also complicated by the fact that they might be partially separate property (the part earned before the marriage) and partially marital property (the part earned since the marriage). This is where the QDRO comes in.

Experts and accountants are often used to research the value of a retirement plan, especially something like a pension that pays out a certain amount at a set time in the future. It’s not easy to put a current value on it without an expert. Once it’s decided how the assets will be divided, the QDRO is an order from the court telling the retirement account administrator exactly how to divide the account, usually by creating separate accounts in each spouse’s name.

There are other options. If spouses have fairly equal retirement plans, then they might decide to each take their own. Even if they aren’t equal, they can agree to this if they wish. If you don’t want to split the retirement plan, then other property can be divided in a way that offsets the value of the retirement plan – Spouse A keeps his or her retirement plan, and Spouse B gets the house, for example.

The main thing to remember is that you shouldn’t rely on an informal or partially-formed agreement when it comes to getting your half or share of a retirement plan or pension. And don’t fall into the trap of putting off the QDRO until after the divorce. At that point, there isn’t as much or an incentive to resolve things and you might have to go back to court to make it happen.

If you are dealing with this issue or any other Illinois legal issue, we are happy to help you at any time.

child-visitation

Yes, if you can show that things have changed since the last visitation order was issued and that the changes warrant a new visitation order. In other words, you usually have to show that things aren’t working the way they are.

If one parent moves farther away, the current visitation schedule might not be practical or even possible to maintain. You can ask the judge to issue a new order that takes the new living situation into account. Similarly, work hours might change. If your schedule changes at work and you no longer are able to see your child during the set visitation times, then you can ask the judge for a new order with a new visitation schedule. Another reason a parent seeks a change is if the visiting parent has chosen not to see the child at the set times, or at all.

The need for a change in a visitation schedule might seem obvious but that doesn’t mean it’s automatic. In Illinois, the judge decides based on the “best interests” of the child – the standard that the courts must follow in most custody-related issues. These “best interests” include looking at the wishes of the parents and child, the relationship the child has with the parents and the ability for those relationships to continue, the child’s home, school and community, as well as the mental and physical health of all of those involved.

If you are trying to keep your child away from his or her other parent, you will have to have a good reason to do so. The courts will give reasonable visitation to non-custodial parents in most cases. In order to prevent that, you’ll have to prove that visitation with the other parent is dangerous for your child’s physical or mental health. Unless you are protecting the child from an imminent threat of harm, you should get the court order modified before taking matters into your own hands. If you interfere with a visitation order, you could be held in contempt of court.

Hopefully, you and the other parent can reach an agreement on the changes you want made to the visitation order. This will make the process much easier and quicker. To get started, you will have to file a petition with the court and properly notify the other side that you have done so. It’s a good idea to get the advice of an Illinois custody attorney.  If you like our advice or a referral to an attorney, please call us.

download (2)

There’s a common myth that kids can simply pick which parent they want to live with after a divorce.  The reality is that it’s up to the parents, if they can agree, or the judge if they can’t. Until a child is 18, they don’t get to choose. If kids were in charge of the decision, you can imagine what their reasons would be. A 6-year-old would choose the parent with the most lenient video game rules, and a 15-year-old would choose the parent who doesn’t enforce curfews.

While it’s not entirely up to the kids, they do get to have their opinions. And depending on their age, the judge might let them express these opinions. There’s no set age, but if the judge believes they are mature enough to weigh in, he or she is allowed to take their wishes into consideration. It’s not the main factor, but rather one of the many factors, that goes into a final custody decision.

If the parents can’t agree, the judge’s main consideration will be the best interests of the child. It’s a somewhat subjective test, but it’s the law. The judge can take many factors into account in making his or her decision, including the wishes of the mother and father, the child’s relationship with each parent and any siblings, the child’s current community – school, home, support system, etc., as well as the child’s safety (any history of abuse will be an important factor), to name a few.

If you want to change a custody arrangement later on, you’ll have to go back to court and ask for what’s called a modification. In general, you have to wait two years from the custody decision to ask for modification in a contested case. It’s a tough road and modification is usually only allowed where there had been a substantial change in circumstances that directly affects the child or the current custodian has been shown to be unfit to retain custody. If both parents agree to a modification, however, they may be able to ask the judge sooner for a change in custody.

The key to getting a good outcome in any custody case is having an experienced custody attorney. It’s not just about the laws on the books, but about knowing the judge and how he or she generally rules on a particular issue. It’s about knowing the other attorneys and having a good reputation in the local legal community. It’s risky to handle a contested custody case on your own, especially if the other parent has an attorney fighting for their interests. Generally speaking, courts favor the current custody arrangement and are hesitant to keep making changes, so if you make a mistake you can’t just turn around and try again.

 

download (1)

The term “joint custody” is often misunderstood to mean a 50-50 split in parenting time. However, “custody” doesn’t mean physical custody when used in this way. Instead, it’s referring to your ability to make parenting decisions when it comes to your child. Joint custody means that you and the other parent have equal decision-making power and must work together to make choices about the major things in your child’s life, such as education and religion.

Joint custody is awarded in cases where the parents are able to maintain some sort of relationship with each other. In other words, they are on speaking terms and can work together and reach an agreement as issues come up. If the two parents can’t talk without fighting and can’t agree on anything, then a judge is not likely to award joint custody. It would not be in the child’s best interest. Joint custody can be awarded regardless of whether the parents were ever married.

As for physical custody, that can be agreed upon by the parents or ordered by the judge. Many parts of a custody case can be decided by the parents, if they agree and if they are acting in the child’s best interest. The best interest of the child is the judge’s focus in these cases, and the law requires him or her to make it the priority.

The parent who doesn’t have primary physical custody can end up with a range of visitation arrangements, depending on where each parent lives, schedules at school and work, preference of those involved, and again, the best interests of the child. Unless there is a form of abuse happening, the court will aim to create a situation in which the child can have a close relationship with each parent. So, you can end up with joint custody for decision making and visitation for spending time with your child.

The other piece of the puzzle is child support. Joint custody does not rule out child support. A common outcome is that both parents share decision-making ability (joint custody), one has physical custody and the other has a visitation schedule and may also pay child support to the parent who has physical custody. But as you can imagine, there are many different scenarios and ways this can play out.

Joint custody, while important, is not the whole picture. If you believe it’s in your child’s best interest to live with you and that you are entitled to child support, then go after these things. If the other parent disagrees, we suggest getting an experienced family law attorney to help you present your case to the judge. This is especially important if the other parent has an attorney fighting for what they want.
If you have questions about your work injury or need help dealing with the insurance company, contact us. You can call us at (312) 346-5320 or (800) 517-1614, or fill out our online form. It’s free and confidential.

Written by Michael Helfand

See also: Can I change my child’s visitation schedule between my ex and me?

Free Case Review
From Our Attorneys

Archives