Find The Best Attorney For Your Case
(312) 346-5320 or (800) 517-1614
Free Consultations - 24/7
No Appointment Needed, Just Call

Illinois Lawyers Blog, Talk To An Attorney For Free

StripSearch-101

School administrators are responsible for the safety of their students, and it’s generally accepted that they can use reasonable means to keep the school safe and discipline those who break the rules. As with most things, however, there is a line between what’s reasonable and what’s not. A recent news article reports that the parent of a 13-year-old is suing the Round Lake school district for strip-searching her child. It brings up the question of how far is too far.

Strip searching a student, and doing so without notifying the parents, certainly crosses the line in my opinion. It goes too far. School teachers and administrators do assume some of the roles of parents and police when students are in their building, but the fact is, they are not the police and they are not the parents.

Student privacy rights at school are somewhat controversial. Public school districts and their employees are essentially the government, which makes it a civil rights issue – unreasonable searches and seizures are a violation of constitutional privacy rights. However, the Supreme Court has said that students have a lesser expectation of privacy when they’re at school. So the law has allowed some leeway, with the idea that administrators and teachers need to have control over their student body.

Some states, including Illinois, have specific laws on the topic. Illinois law says that student property can be searched (lockers, purses, backpacks, etc.) for pretty much any reason and without student consent. The law even extends to students’ cars that are parked on school property. The same rationale applies to mandatory drug testing of athletes and other students. No search warrants are required.

Strip searches, however, are a different story. While there isn’t a law that specifically says strip searches cannot happen, many courts have ruled that strip searches are a violation of a student’s rights. If the school has serious concerns that something dangerous is being hidden under a student’s clothes, they should call the police. The parents should be notified. There are very few instances where a strip search of a student is going to be justified as usually other options are available that are less invasive.

The parent in the Round Lake case is suing for $1.2 million, claiming her son was emotionally distressed by the illegal search he had to endure. I don’t have enough facts to say what this case will settle for, but if true the student deserves something and it needs to be enough to deter the school from this type of behavior in the future.

See also: Do You Have An Illinois Civil Rights Violation Lawsuit?

Unpaid_Wages_2

A reader asks:

I am looking for a Chicago lawyer to help me get a commission of more than $10,000 that my employer owes me from some sales I have made.  They say I won’t get it because I took a new job and their company policy is that you have to be employed at the time a commission is due.  That seems unfair.

It is unfair, but under the Illinois Wage Pay and Collection Act, employers are allowed to set their own policies as to when commissions can be earned and paid.  It’s completely legal for them to say you have to be an employee to get your money.  We’ve seen many other situations where an employee doesn’t get paid until the customer pays.  That too unfortunately is legal as well.

So to determine whether or not you will get paid a commission, we have to see what policy your employer has.  They can’t just change it on the fly and if it’s not in writing then there is a good chance that it doesn’t actually exist.

My advice to any sales person is to get clarification in writing before you start performing work.  Otherwise you may find yourself at their mercy.

But whatever you do, don’t assume that you are owed nothing.  We will always give you a free consultation to determine if there are any loopholes or rights that you have and will of course do whatever we can to make sure that you get paid.  Often we find that other violations are occurring that entitle you to your money in the end.

download (75)

So imagine that you’ve had a driver’s license in Texas or Georgia or Oregon or some place like that for the last 20 years and you go to renew that license which you’ve had for 20 years and they tell you that your license is suspended.  You are confused because you haven’t had as much as a speeding ticket for years and you are also a bit freaked out because you need your car for work and will lose your job without a license.

After a little investigation you discover that the reason your drivers license is suspended is because 30 years ago you lived in Illinois and got a DUI.  You haven’t been in Illinois since and don’t want to ever come back.  But because of that DUI, Illinois has suspended your license and now that you are ineligible in Illinois you are ineligible everywhere.

The truth is that you’ve been suspended for a while, but only in recent years did States begin to share information with each other.  And the law is that if you can’t get a license in Illinois you can’t get it anywhere.

It’s a total b.s. situation to have driven for years and now be told that you can’t, but it’s also something you have to deal with.  The good news is that you don’t have to come back to Illinois.  What you can do is hire a lawyer and get an out of state driver’s license reinstatement hearing.  The bad news is that you have to jump through hoops like this to get your license back, it takes time and you have to pay money to the State and a lawyer.  The good news is that if you get an attorney, at least the ones that we recommend, the success rate is over 95% as compared to around 40% when you go at it alone.

So this is really one of those crappy situations where you can be pissed off, will be pissed off and should be pissed off.  But after that you need to realize that finding an attorney in Illinois will likely solve the problem.  You’ll never feel good about having to do this process, but in the end at least you should be able to get your license and life back.

1364273306_witness

I don’t know of very many people that enjoy having to go to court and testify.  In fact, the only people who really like it are expert witnesses who get paid for their time being there.  Otherwise almost every witness, plaintiff or defendant I’ve ever met would rather be somewhere else.  That said, if you have to do it, I’m sure it is made easier if you know what to expect.  I’m surprised how many lawyers don’t prepare their clients about what is going to happen and how to approach the day.  And if you are just a witness and not part of the case you can bet that no one is going to give you advice.  So for those that do have to go to court in Illinois to testify, here are some things to know:

  1. It’s not very much like what you see on TV in that it’s very boring, doesn’t happen fast and in most cases a witness is just a piece to the puzzle, not the reason everyone is there.
  2. What is like TV is that there will be a Judge, a court reporter, security, lawyers for each side and in some cases a jury.
  3. There is no dress code per se, but you can’t wear a hat or messy clothing and you wouldn’t want to.  That doesn’t mean that you have to wear a suit, but you should look nice.  No shorts, no t-shirts is a good rule of thumb.  No open toed shoes are another.  For men, a collared shirt and khaki pants is usually acceptable.  For women, a conservative top and long skirt or pants works.
  4. It may seem obvious, but your job is to just be honest.  Don’t embellish or say what you think the lawyer asking questions wants to hear.  It’s the job of an attorney to ask the right questions.  Your job is to just answer them truthfully, not figure out what he/she wants to hear.
  5. Just answer the question asked.  The worst thing a witness can do other than lie is to ramble on and on.  Most questions are yes or no.  If they require an explanation, again the attorney can ask for one.  For example, if a lawyer asks you, “Were you at the 7-11 on June 1st when it was robbed?” you should say “yes”, not “I was because my wife had asked me to go and pick up some ice cream because she was pregnant at the time really was craving chocolate chip which is her favorite.  Anyway, I saw this guy with a gun . .. ”  When you add in extra information it drags the process out, frustrates the Judge and doesn’t help anyone.
  6. There is no reward for finishing fast.  Your answers are under oath.  So before you answer, make sure you understand what the question is.  If you don’t understand the question, tell the lawyer that asked it that you are not sure what they mean.  It’s their job to ask a clear question.  If you need a moment to think of your answer or how to say it, that is fine too.
  7. There is a court reporter taking down everything that is said.  She can only get down one person at a time.  So if the lawyer is asking a question, even if you know what they are asking, let them finish the whole question before you answer.  And to the best of your ability, talk slowly or at least in a normal speech pattern.
  8. If you hear one of the lawyers object to a question you should stop talking and wait for the Judge to instruct you on whether or not to answer.
  9. There may be times when the two lawyers and the Judge are having a side conference or when an attorney takes a five minute break or something else happens.  Bottom line is that it’s not exciting and don’t expect it to be.
  10. While it may be nerve racking for you to testify, the reality is that unless you are in a high profile case that is being covered by the media, the only people that care about what’s going on are the parties to the case.  So relax and just focus on the truth.
  11. Most lawyers are really nice.  It’s possible that one of the attorneys will be aggressive in questioning you, but the Judge will not let them bully you.  And if there is a jury, they don’t want to look like jerks so usually they will be nice even if they are trying to poke holes in what you are saying.
  12. If you are a plaintiff or defendant you should be at the court hearing the whole time.  If you are a witness and testifying by a subpoena (e.g. you have to be there per court order), you can leave usually when your testimony is done.  You will always be subpoenaed for the start of the day, but often don’t testify until the afternoon.  Many attorneys will tell you when they’ll need you and often will let you be “on call” as long as you are near by.  Just ask.
  13. Every case and witness is different, but most get off the stand after an hour or so.
  14. If you have a health issue, let the Judge know.  So if you have a bad back, ask the Judge if you can stand as needed.  If you need to take a drink of water, do it.  And by all means, if you need to use the bathroom, ask the Judge if you can take a break.
  15. Finally, when your testimony is done, there is still a chance you could be recalled to testify again.  You shouldn’t discuss the case with anyone related to it (e.g. the plaintiff, a lawyer, etc.) until the case is over.  But don’t stress, almost every time you get off the witness stand you are done forever.

Hopefully these tips help.   And remember, it could be worse.  You could have jury duty!

business-startup1

If you are married and want to break up you file for a divorce.  But if you want to break up with a business partner, the process is actually similar.

If you are going to start a business or join one, it may sound counter-intuitive, but the first thing you should be thinking about is what are you going to do if you want out of the business.  No one likes to think that way, but any good lawyer will tell you that you should have a partnership agreement.

A partnership agreement is like a pre-nup.  It decides up front why you’d sell, how much you’d ask for and what to do if one of you wants out and the other one doesn’t.  So if the agreement says that you have to pay me 95% of the value of my shares or sell the business, there is no fighting over what you are owed once the valuation takes place. If it lists a specific dollar amount the same thing is true.

But if you have no agreement then there is chaos and the only way to get out if you can’t agree is to go through a potentially expensive legal battle.

We recently were called be a restaurant owner who wanted to sell.  His partner wanted to keep going, but didn’t have the funds for a buy out.  So now the caller has to hire a lawyer and file a suit with the hopes that a Judge will order his partner to put the business up for sale.  He can still get the result he wants, but it will be messy.

When you start a business, you likely want to save some money.  I know I did.  But if you are going to skimp, don’t do it on getting a clear partnership agreement put in place that details what each partner is supposed to do and how they will handle problems.  If you don’t then you are asking for trouble sometime down the road.

ku-medium

We talk a lot about experience being one of the most important factors in choosing the right lawyer for your case. We stand by this advice but suggest that you don’t take it to the extreme. More experience is usually a good thing, but there is a tipping point – a point at which an attorney might actually have too much experience.

I was thinking about this recently after a woman called me and told me she was hiring a 74-year-old lawyer for her case because he had “seen and done it all.” The lawyer was 90 minutes away from where they needed to be for court. The only reason she was hiring him was because of his many years of experience.

I cautioned her that it might not be a good idea. Focusing only on the number of years a lawyer has been practicing is not a good way to pick one. It’s shortsighted. Experience is certainly important, but only if it’s relevant and up-to-date.

The experience should be related to your legal issue. Does the attorney’s experience include practice in the area of law your case involves? Has the attorney handled a significant number of similar cases? Was this experience recent (and not 20 years ago when the law was different)? Is the attorney’s experience local, meaning that he or she is familiar with the other attorneys and the judges at the courthouse where your case is being heard? Does your attorney have a good reputation there?

Another thing to consider, if you’re hiring an attorney with decades of experience, is whether they are still on top of their game. Burnout is common in the legal profession. An attorney needs to maintain a certain level of ambition and passion in order to fully represent the best interests of their clients. I think it’s safe to say to say that an attorney with 15 years of experience is going to be more aggressive than someone with 40 years of experience.

I know of older attorneys who stay in the profession on a limited basis. They’re pretty much retired, but they still handle some cases here and there. I wouldn’t recommend them. You want someone who’s still fully engaged in their career. You want someone who talks to other attorneys every day, someone who continues to do research and learn about changes in the law, and someone who still is fully committed to their work. Not someone who has one foot out the door.

images (40)

Actually, it is as easy as it sounds, if you qualify. The hard part is that it only applies to a small number of cases and it has to be approved by a judge.

When you file for divorce, one of the first steps is notifying your spouse by serving them a copy of the divorce papers. If a spouse can’t be found or is hiding, you can notify them by publishing notice in the newspaper, if the Judge is petitioned to approve this and does so. This is called service by publication. If your spouse doesn’t come forward, you win by default, and this is called divorce by publication.

If you know where your spouse lives, or know how to find them, then you have to actually have them served and do things the long way.

Notice is published in a local newspaper. It tells your spouse there’s a divorce proceeding against them. The idea is that they’ll see it or someone they know will tell them about it. But it’s also possible they won’t actually find out and that’s ok. The fact that you published it – if done in the right way – fulfills your obligation.

You may have seen the legal notice sections in your newspaper. This is where your divorce notice will be published. It has to run for a certain number of days in a paper that is circulated in the county where you filed for divorce. If your spouse doesn’t respond, the case moves divorce.

Divorce by publication is only for cases where a spouse disappears and you have no idea where to find them. The law isn’t going to force you to stay married to this person forever, so divorce by publication is a compromise. You will have to show the Judge that you tried to locate them, by contacting relatives, employers, friends, landlords, the post office, etc. You are required to make a good faith effort, and you’ll have to submit an affidavit (a sworn statement) that you have done so and that your spouse still cannot be located.

If the Judge approves of your efforts and your spouse does not come forward, your divorce will be granted by default. In this type of divorce, the judge has limited power. They may award custody but can’t rule on child support, maintenance or property division.  But at least you’ll be divorced.

download (81)

It’s something that allows you the rare opportunity to keep a felony off your record. Section 410 of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act allows certain individuals to get probation instead of a conviction if charged with possession of small amounts of drugs. Section 410 is only for someone who has not been convicted or placed on probation for drug possession in the past.

Getting caught with small amounts of cocaine, for example, is a felony. First-time offenders can avoid serving time and can keep their records clean if they qualify for – and successfully complete – their 410 probation.

In order to get 410 probation, you will be found guilty. Then, the judge basically puts your case on hold. If you successfully complete the probation, then the case is dismissed. If you fail to comply with the terms of your probation, the probation can be revoked and you can be sentenced to whatever penalty the law allows … It’s as if you’re going back to the day you pled guilty, but without the option of probation. You only are eligible for 410 probation one time.

Many people fail 410 probation because the requirements are strict. You cannot break the law during your probation; you cannot possess a firearm; you must submit to periodic drug testing (and pay for it yourself); and you must complete 30 hours of community service in most cases. The judge has the discretion to include additional requirements, such as paying fines and undergoing treatment.

Employers often ask if you have been convicted of a crime. One of the main benefits to 410 probation is that you can answer “no.”

If you can get through probation, you still have one more step to go through if you want to completely erase it from your record. After five years, you can petition for expungement. If granted, the record of your probation will be completely erased. Most types of probation cannot be expunged; 410 probation is an exception.

Keep in mind that 410 probation is not granted automatically. An experienced defense attorney can let you know if it’s realistic for your case.

mike-and-jenny-prenup2

The other day I had a woman call me who was looking for full custody of her kids with the right to make all of the parenting decisions.  Usually when I get a request like this it comes from a very involved parent whose ex is not around or is abusive to the kids.  In this case though, she admitted that the Dad spent a ton of time with the kids and while he was a good Dad, he apparently is a real jerk to her.

In Illinois, to get the full custody she wants, she would have to show that it’s in the best interests of her kids.  I asked her what the argument would be that this would be best for her kids and the only thing that she could come up with was, “it would make their mom less crazy to not have to deal with him anymore.”

Most divorced people don’t like being around their ex, but that’s not a reason to end someone’s parental rights.  I told her that if we found a lawyer for her and they filed the case, the attorney would be stealing money from her.  I can’t in good conscience make a recommendation because it’s not the right thing to do.

This didn’t set well with her and she unfortunately started to cry.  But it’s my job to be honest with people that call me, even if that means I tell you the opposite of what you want to hear.  There are many lawyers that will say whatever the client wants them to.  That does nobody any good.  And if you are looking for that type of attorney you should look elsewhere.  We don’t promise results, but we do promise to always tell it like it is.

shoplifting

Generally, yes. When a store manager or security guard suspects someone of trying to steal something or conceal it with the intent to steal, they can detain the person. They can look through the person’s bags and even hold them until police show up (if they decide to call the police).

The law is vague on how far a store can go. It says that the store must have reasonable grounds to believe you were stealing and then they can detain you in a reasonable manner for a reasonable amount of time.

I think they’re supposed to actually see you take the item from their shelves or wherever it’s kept on display. Often, people bring merchandise from other stores with them, or have something on them that they purchased at that store on a different day. They’re also supposed to actually see you conceal it and walk out of the store or at least past the point where you’re supposed to pay. Ultimately, it’s your word against theirs.

We hear from people who want to sue the store or the person who held them for doing so without any basis. Being detained by store security is not an arrest by police, so all those constitutional rights aren’t at issue. If they follow the law on detaining you in a reasonable way, even if you’re completely innocent, you won’t be able to sue for false arrest or illegal detention.

And, unfortunately, even if the detention IS unreasonable, it’s most likely not a lawsuit. Lawsuits are based on physical injury or monetary loss. It’s going to be hard to prove you suffered either. Attorneys who file lawsuits on behalf of injured clients only get paid if they win, and their fee is a percentage of what they get for their clients. If there isn’t a dollar amount at stake, they’re not going to waste their time on the case.

There are limits, of course. You can’t be detained for a super long time. And a store owner or security guard can’t be overly physical with you. But unless something egregious happens to you, a lawsuit isn’t the way to go.

Many retailers these days recover losses from theft by sending out civil demand letters. They hire a law firm to do this. The letter says you have to pay a couple hundred dollars, or else they will sue you. These are legal, but the threats might be empty. It’s often not worth it to file a lawsuit to collect such a small amount.

So it’s generally a good idea to cooperate and not fight if you are detained. The security guard will probably let you go without calling the police, so long as you didn’t try to steal anything major and you don’t cause trouble. If police are called, your rights kick in and you can (and should) get an attorney before answering questions. And in both cases, it’s a bad idea to sign a confession without legal advice.

See also: Civil Demand Letter Attorneys, Should You Pay?

download (86)

One of the biggest reasons people are hesitant to hire a lawyer in Illinois is that they “aren’t the suing type.”  It’s almost as if people feel that they need to apologize for calling a law firm to seek help.

I’m not sure what the suing type is.  I suppose my callers are thinking of others who they think will sue anyone for any reason.  I suppose those people are out there, but I hardly ever see them and I’ve talked to more than 200,000 people in 11 years of running our Illinois lawyer referral service.

I’m certainly not the suing type.  I once had to sue a landlord to get my security deposit back, but that was in the 1990’s.  I did file a lawsuit in 2004 against the guy that sold me my Evanston house without disclosing that any time it rained sewage would seep in to the basement.  Other than that I’ve been lawsuit free for eight years.

So I don’t look for trouble, but when I’m wronged and can’t work things out on my own, like anyone else I have to decide if going to court is worth it.

I would assume the suing type will sue anyone, any time.  That’s not a good long term strategy because if you do ever have a legitimate case, your credibility would be hurt because you are so litigious.

If you’ve been wronged, you just need to figure out if getting a lawyer is worth it to you.  But never feel the need to apologize.  When you are seeking legal help for the right reasons you are doing exactly what you should do.

G_Generations
Guardianship, when we’re talking about an adult, is usually set up in cases of age or illness. You might want guardianship over an elderly parent who suffers from dementia, for example. Guardianship isn’t a quick solution. You will have to go to court and ask a judge, who will want to hear from doctors, as well as any family members who object. Here are some answers to a few questions I often get on this topic:

How do I know when it’s time for guardianship?

If a person can no longer handle their financial affairs or make sound decisions about their care, it might be time to seek guardianship. (If they are still of sound mind, consider talking to them about establishing powers of attorney.) There are two types of guardianship, and you can ask the court to grant you one or both. There is guardianship of the estate, which allows the guardian to handle the ward’s finances, and there is guardianship of the person, which is for things like health care and living arrangements.

Do I have to go to court?

Yes. You have to file documents with the court, including a petition requesting guardianship. There are a lot of steps, which include time for an object from the person you’re seeking guardianship over (called the ward), as well as objections from family members. The judge will want the opinion of an expert (doctor, psychiatrist, etc.) and will consider all facts before making a decision in the best interest of the ward. Because guardianship takes away significant legal rights, the court does not award it without good reason.

Do I need to hire an attorney?

We usually recommend it, because there are a lot of hoops to jump through. An attorney can be especially useful if the ward objects or if family members disagree about who should be named guardian. It’s not impossible to handle on your own, but it can get messy.

Is there any way to set this up ahead of time?

Most attorneys would recommend having powers of attorney in place before a person becomes incapacitated or mentally incompetent. A person must be well, mentally speaking, when signing a power of attorney. If done properly, they automatically put someone else in charge of financial affairs and health care (two separate documents). There is no need to go to court when the time comes to take over that person’s affairs. The main thing to be aware of with a power of attorney is that it has to be someone you trust. And a power of attorney signed under intimidation or force will not be valid.

When-is-it-time-to-make-changes-to-your-Estate-Plan

It’s never too late to make some new year’s resolutions. If you’re tired of resolving to lose weight, or get organized, or whatever other promises you make to yourself every year, try these legal resolutions for a change. They won’t all apply to you, but if they do, it might be time to do something about it.

–       Take another look at your estate plan. If you have an outdated estate plan, get it updated as soon as possible. We’d argue that an outdated plan is worse than no plan at all. If you’ve experienced a major life change, such as divorce, marriage, or having a child, then your plan likely needs an update. If you don’t have an estate plan, it’s time to get one. A simple will, perhaps a trust, and powers of attorney are in a typical package. At the very least, properly execute a power of attorney (one for healthcare and one for finances). You can get these forms free online. You also may want to fill out a living will or advance directive (which tells doctors whether you want to be kept alive on life support). I wouldn’t recommend doing your own will or trust, but the other three documents I mentioned aren’t as complicated. If you have legal advice while filling them out, great. But make sure you don’t pay a lot because they’re fairly straight forward.

–       Pay those parking tickets. These can add up and lead to worse than the fine you face now. If you accumulate too many unpaid parking tickets, your license can be suspended. If it gets this far, it’s a pain to take care of. But what’s worse is if you get caught driving on a suspended license. Even if you didn’t know your license was suspended (they notify you but that notice doesn’t always get to the right person), you’re still in the same trouble. Driving on a suspended license is a crime. Jail time isn’t likely if you have a clean record, but it’s certainly on the table. If you can’t afford to pay your parking tickets, ask about payment plans.

–       Get that child support you’ve been waiting for. If you don’t have a court order, that will be your first step. Once you have that order, you can enforce it. It can be daunting, especially if the other parent is hiding, lives out of state, makes their money under the table, etc. However, these are common situations, which child support collection attorneys are familiar with. If you can’t afford to hire an attorney to get you the child support you’re owed, try going through the state. There is an agency that helps parents collect. It’s not as quick, but it’s worth a try if it’s your only option. There are no guarantees either way, unfortunately, but I hate to see people give up before trying. It’s money for your child and it may be possible to get what you’re owed, including past payments that you never received.

–       Check your record. Look for lingering arrests, cases, convictions, etc. You may not be able to clear up everything, but do what you can. In some cases, you can clear up everything. It just depends on what you’ve got. There are two ways to clean up your record – you can seal it or expunge it. Expunging your record (or certain things on it) is the better option because it’s completely erased. Sealing your record is still good, because it will hide your record from the general public at least. Employers can’t see a sealed record when they do a background check, for example. Start by contacting the police department where your case originated or where you were arrested and request a copy of your record.

san-francisco-family-law-attorney

Whether you have shared custody or sole custody of your child, one parent generally cannot make the decision alone to move out of the state of Illinois with the child.  Here are some factors to consider, if you are wanting to make a move.

1.  A petition should be filed with the court asking permission.

If the child has been living in Illinois, generally that is where the petition would be filed.  You would be asking the judge to grant you the right to remove your child from the state.  If the other parent objects, you would have the responsibility to prove your case as to why the change is right.  This could take time, because both sides need adequate time to prepare and present their arguments.  So it is not a decision that can be made at the last minute before you want to be settled somewhere else.

2.  The judge will base the decision on what is in the best interests of your child, taking many factors into account.

Regardless of how badly you may feel that you need a change, or another state is more desirable, if it is not overall in the best interest of your child, you may not be able to move out of the state.  The judge will look at the specifics of your situation and the proposed move, in light of factors such as:  whether the move will enhance the quality of life for you and your child, and in what way; whether your move is based on bad motives, rather than a positive plan; whether the objection to the move is based on bad motives; what the effect will be on the other parent’s visitation, and if it is possible for an appropriate visitation schedule.

3.  A solid plan for a good, enhanced quality of life will go a long way to justifying the move.

The judge will look at many aspects of the new life you are proposing in the new state.  You can show specifics about the community, school system, other family nearby and other support system, and the positive effect it will have on your life that your child will also benefit from.

4.  Problems can arise if paternity has not been established.

If the parents have not been married, and paternity has not been established, it is difficult for the father to prevent the move.  But that does not necessarily mean that the mother is free and clear to move with the child.  The father could take the steps to establish paternity if he knows you may be planning to move, and could then hold it up.  Also, if you move first, and then paternity is established, you may have to return to Illinois to present your case to the judge.

5.  A short vacation out-of-state is generally not so complicated.

In most situations, there does not need to be a complicated procedure just to take a reasonable vacation outside of Illinois.  Usually, with notification to the other parent as to where and when you will be going, along with contact information for the child, there isn’t a problem.

Free Case Review
From Our Attorneys

Archives