Find The Best Attorney For Your Case
(312) 346-5320 or (800) 517-1614
Free Consultations - 24/7
No Appointment Needed, Just Call

Illinois Lawyers Blog, Talk To An Attorney For Free

download (17)

I was asked to provide a women’s magazine some tips for stay at home Moms in Chicago that are going through a divorce. Here is the advice I shared which is valid for men and women.

1. Unless there was a pre-nup, remember that everything acquired during the marriage is a marital asset. So if your husband started a business, you own part of that.

2. Child custody and visitation is based on the best interests of the child. Don’t assume that because you’ve stayed at home with the kids that will get to continue. You need to document what you do with the kids in great detail as well as concerns about your husband’s parenting if you have any. If you have a child that plays soccer and your spouse hasn’t been to one of their practices or games, you need to note that. If you are the only one that helps with homework, make it clear. Don’t assume that custody is yours. Hope for the best and prepare for the worst.

3. If a divorce is sprung upon you, it can be shocking. But you need to start thinking long term about what you want out of life for you and your children. If you can’t start thinking about your life in 6 months, two years, 5 years and ten years then you could be setting yourself up for trouble. As best you can, take the emotion out of the situation and start thinking about your long term desires. That could involve where you want to live, what religion the kids will have, what you want to do if you go back to work, how you will feel if your spouse re-marries, etc. Goal setting is the #1 thing any person going through a divorce can think about.

4. It’s sad but true that being able to pay for the right lawyer can make all of the difference in the world. In many states, if you are a stay at home mom, your husband could be on the hook for your legal fees. But that’s no slam dunk and you should do whatever you can to save or borrow enough to have a proper retainer fee to hire the right lawyer for your case.

5. Don’t take legal advice from your husband. I’ve had many women (and men) call me in a panic, telling me that their spouse says they will get nothing and never see the kids again. Your spouse isn’t the Judge. Don’t take advice from them as they are not looking out for what is best for you. They are just trying to get in your head and you can’t let them.

Written by Michael Helfand

R1-01577-022A-525x354
So last week we had one of the worst rain storms in memory.  I had terrible flashbacks of the multiple times my Evanston house flooded years ago.

When it rains like that or even when it snows, it’s common for people to drag water in to stores and buildings.  And when that happens, it’s common for people to fall.

One caller to my office busted open his head when he slipped after walking in to his apartment building.  There were no wet floor signs nor was there any carpeting or mat laid down.  To make matters worse, his complex has four buildings and in the other three there was carpeting to help soak up some of the water and protect people from falling.  They also had wet floor signs.  He’s injured and mad and wanted to sue.

Unfortunately he has no case.  When people drag water in to a building, generally speaking the building owner does not have liability for slip and falls that occur.  While morally they should take precautions, legally they don’t have to have someone there 24/7 cleaning up the floors.  It would be too cost prohibitive for many people.

Had the rain leaked through a roof it would be a different story.  But when it’s raining outside and people bring in the water on their shoes, building owners aren’t liable.

I don’t necessarily agree with this law, but one thing is that I will never tell you what you want to hear and will always tell the truth.  The reality is that the insurance industry has a strong lobby and they’ve gotten many stringent slip and fall laws passed.

All of this said, don’t assume you have no case without talking to a lawyer first.  There are often exceptions and loopholes and of course it doesn’t cost anything to call our office and ask questions.  But I wouldn’t get your hopes up either.

Written by Michael Helfand

download (31)

The fact that you receive a salary rather than hourly pay doesn’t automatically disqualify you from getting overtime. However, certain employees are disqualified based on their job description and it just so happens that many of these jobs (skilled, professional positions) tend to be salaried positions. The point is that you need to look at what you do, not how you’re paid, when determining whether you’re owed overtime. If it’s unclear, check with an employment attorney. They know the law (which is sort of vague on this subject) and more importantly, if they have a lot of experience, they will know how to apply the law to many different types of employees.

The basic rule of overtime pay is that employees who work more than 40 hours in a week must be paid 1.5 times their regular pay for the hours over 40. However, there are several laws on the issue, and several exceptions to this general rule.

First of all, some employers are exempt, meaning that they don’t have to pay anyone overtime. This category includes employers who have fewer than three employees or less than $500,000 in annual sales.

Second, some employees are exempt. The law says that employees in professional, administrative and executive jobs are not entitled to overtime pay. It’s a somewhat vague category. Obviously, the CEO of a company, as an executive, would not be entitled to overtime. That part makes sense. The term “professional,” however, is fairly broad. For example, teachers, engineers, lawyers, secretaries, accountants, truck drivers and those in sales are usually exempt. You might need to talk to a lawyer to figure out if you are in an exempt category.

So what can you do? You can take your employer to court to get what you’re owed. In fact, you can usually attempt to collect up to three years of past-due overtime pay. In addition, the court can award double the amount in some cases in order to penalize an employer. If you are unsure whether you’re owed overtime, ask an attorney. A consultation with a lawyer does not mean you have to take the next step and file lawsuit. If you know you are owed overtime, you can pursue a case even if you don’t have records of how much you worked. Employers are required by law to keep track and keep records. Also, immigration status does not affect your right to overtime pay.

More questions? Give us a call.

Written by Michael Helfand

Class actions are civil lawsuits based on personal injury, and attorney fees follow the general formula that you see in injury lawsuits – contingency fees. The attorney only gets paid if they win the case. If they win, they get take their fee out of the amount they were able to get for their client or clients. If they lose, there is no fee.

In a class action, the fee might be a percentage of the lump sum the attorney gets for the class. It also could be negotiated with the defendant as part of the settlement. Either way, the judge has to review and approve the attorney’s fee in a class action case.

In a class action, there is a lead plaintiff and a lead attorney. The attorney works with the lead plaintiff on the case. The others in the class generally don’t get involved in the litigation, which involves gathering evidence, giving testimony, attending hearings and trial and participating in settlement discussions and negotiations.

Because class action attorneys work on a contingency basis, the lead plaintiff does not take on any financial risk by being the representative of the larger class. The lead plaintiff will be named on the case and is technically the one filing the lawsuit, but the lead attorney should cover filing fees and other administrative costs. This is typical of most large injury lawsuits.

There has been some controversy over attorney fees in class action lawsuits. For a large class, each individual settlement amount will inevitably look small next to the legal fees, but keep in mind the fees are based on the lump sum settlement for the entire class. The attorney is essentially representing all of the plaintiffs. And the fact remains that these individuals need an attorney and a successful class action in order to go up against a large defendant in the first place. Going up against a national or multi-national corporation simply isn’t possible for the average consumer.

05/29/13

images (12)

If you are injured by a defective product, you may have a products liability case. In other words, you may want to sue the manufacturer or seller of the product and seek compensation for your injuries. A well-known products liability example is when someone is injured because their airbag fails to deploy. Another example is when someone is injured by a defective prescription drug.

Products can be defective in a few different ways. There are design defects, where the product was designed poorly. In this situation, you’d have to prove that the designer was negligent.

Products can have a manufacturing defect, which means that the design was proper but a mistake was made during the manufacturing process. You generally do not have to prove negligence in the case of a manufacturing defect; you just have to prove that the defect existed.

Another way that a product can be defective is if it’s unreasonably dangerous and does not include a warning. A person injured by such a product can sue under products liability. In these cases, the product is generally designed and manufactured properly, but it is so dangerous that it requires a warning to the consumer.

Aside from considering the type of defect involved, you (and your attorney) will consider the extent of your injuries before deciding whether to pursue a lawsuit. Basically, if your injuries are serious, you will have an easier time finding an attorney to take your case. Like many personal injury lawsuits, a products liability lawsuit can be very expensive. One reason is that experts are paid to testify about the product and its defect. Attorneys usually cover these costs, so they are picky about the cases they take and prefer those with a likelihood of success, as well as a significant recovery. If your airbag fails to open, but you suffer only a minor concussion, you will have a hard time finding an attorney to take your case.

Products liability attorneys generally charge a contingency fee. This means that they are not paid hourly – they are paid a percentage of what you win. If you don’t get anything, neither do they. It’s a risk for the attorney, but with a possible reward for taking that risk. For the client, contingency fees level the playing field – anyone can afford a lawyer because the client pays nothing upfront in most cases.

Your best bet for a successful products liability claim is to hire an attorney with significant experience in this area of law. In Illinois, you’ll probably find these attorneys in Chicago, although there are products liability attorneys elsewhere. The bottom line is to find an established firm or attorney, meaning that they have products liability experience, a good reputation and a track record of success.

We know who the established products liability attorneys are in Illinois. Call or email us at any time for a free case evaluation. We’ll listen, answer your questions, and refer you to the best attorney we know for your situation.

Written by Michael Helfand

download (36)

Looking for an attorney in Illinois that will take a case where they receive a percentage of a recovery is a common request. This is called working on a contingency basis. We just got a call from someone looking for a Chicago contingency law firm so I thought I’d write about how to get one.

To get an attorney to take on your case where they don’t get paid until you do, they need some reasonable belief that there will be money recovered when the case is done. As a result, the typical contingency base is a personal injury claim like a car accident, medical malpractice, workers’ compensation, slip and fall, etc. We also know many attorneys that will take a case on a percentage when you are going for unpaid wages, overtime benefits, sales commissions, social security disability benefits, legal malpractice (when there is a provable financial harm), class action lawsuits and collection matters.

For cases like divorce or criminal defense, it’s illegal for the attorney to work on a percentage. In criminal cases of course there is no recovery. Same would be true if you are the defendant in a civil law suit. If you aren’t going to be winning anything, you’ll have to pay for help. For some this makes it very challenging to find representation.

In some commercial litigation lawsuits, attorneys will work for a percentage if two things can be shown. 1. That the ultimate payoff looks to be worth justifying the risk of working all the time it will take. 2. That there is no counter-claim. In other words, if you are suing someone and they are suing you, a lawyer can’t defend you a contingency basis. And even if they do it for free, the fear they will have is that each side will say to the other that if “you drop your claim, I’ll drop mine.” That can work out great for the client and that should be the goal. But if the attorney knows he/she might not get compensated they won’t touch it in the first place.

Will contests are similar. Typically those are handled via an hourly fee, but if there is a valid will challenge, then you might not have to pay anything up front. Just beware lawyers that take a percentage when they are just processing a will. We’ve seen some crooks (lawyers) end up with over $100,000 in legal fees because they took a percentage of a probate estate that had no disputes. The lawyers we know would have charged by the hour and the total fees would have been less than $5,000.

We are always happy to talk with you for free to see if there is anyone that we know for your case or if there is way to get an attorney that won’t collect if they aren’t successful. So please feel free to contact us at any time and we’ll do whatever we can for you.

Written by Michael Helfand

See also: Can I Afford An Illinois Medical Malpractice Lawyer?

Tetraplegia-1

Tetraplegia is paralysis of the torso and limbs. It varies in severity and can be the result of an accident or illness. A Tetraplegia lawsuit may come about if the condition was caused, or even partially caused, by someone’s negligence. Most instances of Tetraplegia require significant medical care that lasts throughout a person’s life. An injured person can sue for compensation for this and other financial loss.

Some causes of Tetraplegia include birth injuries, sports injuries, automobile accidents, work injuries, congenital disorders such as muscular dystrophy or multiple sclerosis, and some serious diseases that involve damage to the spinal cord. When a disease is involved, delayed diagnosis can be a contributing factor. If your healthcare provider failed to diagnose an illness when they should have, and their error allowed the condition to worsen and cause permanent harm, it would be a medical malpractice lawsuit.

If you or a loved one have been affected by Tetraplegia, you know that it changes many aspects of a person’s life. It significantly affects the entire family. Caring for someone with Tetraplegia is time-consuming and expensive. Not only is the injured person unable to work, but their spouse, partner or parent may not be able work as much as they used to because they have to take on the role of caretaker. If the injured family member was once the main wage earner, it can be a struggle to make ends meet. A personal injury lawsuit includes a demand for these losses, as well.

A Tetraplegia lawsuit might be against a healthcare provider, a property owner, a manufacturer, a motorist, etc. If the injury was caused by a defective product, then a products liability lawsuit is an option. If injury is caused by a work accident, then a workers’ compensation claim or a third-party lawsuit might be an option. Damages include the losses mentioned above (medical bills and lost wages), as well as payment for future medical costs and often compensation for pain and suffering.

If you have a case as serious as a Tetraplegia lawsuit, we recommend hiring an attorney who has handled similar cases before and done so successfully. Please contact us if you have further questions about whether a Tetraplegia injury lawsuit might be a good course of action.

Written by Michael Helfand

Lawyer-unethical

 

We turn down more cases that we accept. It’s usually because the case is so small that it wouldn’t justify the time that we’d need to spend. We’d rather help clients that really need us due to major problems.

The other big reason we turn down a case is if we don’t think there is a case to be made. It’s unethical for a lawyer to file a case when he knows that it has no merit. In fact, an attorney could lose their license for doing this. Besides, who would want to waste their time with a case that in the end is going to be a ton of work for no money? So from a selfish standpoint, no lawyer in their right mind should take on a crappy case. That doesn’t mean we don’t take on tough cases, but it does mean we won’t take on cases that have no reasonable chance.

I thought of this when I was contacted by a woman who wanted me to help a relative of hers. He was at work and had some drinks after he punched out. He drank too much and went to his car in the parking lot to get a nap and sleep off the alcohol. Somehow the car caught fire and he was burned.

An attorney told them that they have a great case because it happened on company property. My take is that it’s not a case at all because he wasn’t working, put himself at risk of injury because of the drinking and the car has nothing to do with his employer. But because some lawyer told them they have a great case, their expectations are huge. Shockingly, that attorney withdrew from the case after he filed it and was told by the insurance company that they won’t pay a penny.

So now the family is calling around to new lawyers and they have unrealistic expectations. When you call us, we don’t promise we’ll tell you what you want to hear, but we’ll always tell the truth. And if we do take on your case, we’ll fight like hell for you. And we’ll have time to do that because we don’t waste our time with cases that shouldn’t be brought in the first place.

Written by Michael Helfand

download (37)
A common call for us to receive is from someone who has custody of a child and is married to someone who is not the parent of the child by blood, but is a parent in the fact that they love them, take care of them, provide for them, etc. So the birth parent wants their spouse to adopt their child. The question is, how do you make that happen?

For purposes of this post, let’s assume that it’s a woman who called me and is the mother of the child, wanting her husband to adopt the child. To make that happen, she will first have to terminate the rights of the birth father.

Terminating the parental rights of someone is not taken lightly by the courts because once it happens, it’s not reversible. So even if the Dad has been an absent parent, they will be given the opportunity to come to court and state why their rights shouldn’t be terminated. Of course, if they are agreeable then it’s a slam dunk, but in most cases the Judge will give them the wake up call that they need or in others people come to their senses when they realize the finality of losing their rights.

To get a termination order approved when it’s contested, you need to show how little the other parent has been involved in the child’s life and also that it’s in the best interests of the child for this to happen. Sometimes the other parent isn’t involved, but there family is so everything will be looked at.

Once you get that order approved, it’s final. At that point you can go about petitioning for your new spouse to adopt your child. That is usually a smooth, easy process because nobody can contest it and everyone involved is on the same side. And of course it’s a smart thing to do because if you were to die and your spouse hadn’t adopted your child(ren), then they may have no rights to them after you pass away.

Written by Michael Helfand

We are Illinois attorneys that don’t want to represent you.  Instead we want to find you the best law firm for your unique case.  No lawyer is right for every situation.  You need to find the best one for you.

Even when you know what type of lawyer to look for, it can be hard to figure out which one to hire.  So many attorneys are full of it.  That doesn’t make them bad lawyers, but it means that they aren’t always truthful.

Case in point, a woman called us recently who had torn her rotator cuff on the job.  She called a local lawyer and when she told him what her injury was, he told her that she was in luck, he’s known as the top rotator cuff injury attorney in the area.

This is like the restaurants that claim they have the #1 pizza in Chicago or some other un-verifiable claim.  It doesn’t pass the smell test.  You can’t just give yourself and award that you made up and claim yourself as the best.

Fortunately the caller to my office had enough sense to view this attorney as a used car salesman and was able to find someone more reputable through us.  But that sleazy shtick works because these attorneys keep on feeding people this line of b.s.

When you go to an attorney, you are in charge of whether or not you hire them if they want to take your case on.  You come with facts about your case for them to learn, but you also need to bring common sense with you.  If they are too slick, too young or just too confident in themselves, keep looking elsewhere.  A lawyer with experience is a great thing to have.  A lawyer that makes up their success is a sign of the wrong attorney for you.

Written by Michael Helfand

download (43)

Here’s a secret about working with an attorney in Illinois.  You almost never see them face to face.  You might when you first hire them and maybe if you have to give a deposition or the case goes to trial some day, but the reality is that whether your lawyer is down the block or 20 miles away, you’ll probably see them the same amount.  And believe it or not, many people sign up through the mail and despite tons of phone calls and e-mails, choose to never see their lawyer in person at all.

Our advice is to always hire the law firm that gives you the best chance for a good result.  That is usually based on the practice focus of the lawyer, their years of experience, knowledge with similar cases, track record of  success and many intangibles such as do they fight for you, how is their customer service, what is their availability, etc.

Some people are deathly afraid of coming in to the city of Chicago.  If you have a DUI in Wheaton, you don’t need a Chicago attorney.  But if you have a major personal injury claim or a Federal criminal case or high end divorce, the fact of the matter is that the best firms are in the City.  You might save yourself travel time one day, but in the long run you will likely you harm your case.

For Cook County cases this is especially true.  I recently had a woman call me looking for a referral to a new car accident lawyer.  She had an attorney in her neighborhood on the southside, but he never returned calls and one day she discovered he had left the firm.  I recommended a top car accident lawyer in Chicago, but she was very hesitant because she didn’t want to travel and ultimately stuck with her same guy.  Now the case was going to be filed downtown so if she ever had to go to court she’d have to travel.  So would her attorney.  But this firm doesn’t want to go downtown because it’s a hassle for them too.  As a result they have a reputation of settling cases for whatever is offered instead of going for what’s best for the client.

Finding the law firm that gives you the best chance of a good result doesn’t guarantee that you’ll be happy or that you’ll win.  But it sure makes it much more likely.   Sometimes that is found right down the street.  Other times you might have to travel.  But I promise you that when all is said and done you will be happy that you looked out for yourself and went with the firm that increased your chances.

Written by Michael Helfand

download (42)

A few months ago, a caller contacted us looking for a referral to a Chicago legal malpractice lawyer.  The gist of the case is that the family hired a personal injury attorney who settled a case, but did not pay the settlement money to the right person.  So we talked to the caller and connected them with a law firm that is willing to sue other attorneys.

As hypocritical as it may be, not many lawyers will sue someone else in their profession.  And before they do, you have to make sure they don’t have a conflict of interest.

The typical conflict of interest happens when one person knows another.  So before you tell your whole story, your first question should be, “Do you have a conflict in suing Tom Smith (or whoever the law firm is)?”  If they tell you that they know them, you should stop talking and look elsewhere.

In this case, the firm I recommended did not have a conflict of interest.  But what struck me as very odd is that the defense team, that was put together by the legal malpractice insurance company, included a guy who heavily promotes himself as someone that can represent plaintiffs.  In other words, if you call him and tell him your story, you are at risk of divulging everything to the insurance company.

To me this is a huge conflict of interest.  None of the lawyers we recommend play both sides of the fence.  They either represent plaintiffs or they represent defendants.  These firms that try to do it all in my opinion are not acting in the best interests of their potential clients and should make clear on their website that they represent certain insurance companies.

So the 2nd question you should ask a plaintiff’s attorney is “Do you represent insurance companies in these cases?”  Again, if the answer is yes, you should move on.

Remember, you have to look out for you.  These are questions that if you don’t ask, no one else will.  And if you find out about a conflict when it’s too late, you may have damaged your case.  If you aren’t sure about what questions to ask or who to hire, that’s what we are for.  We are happy to help guide you at any time.

Written by Michael Helfand

7518374070_48c61e0b4a_k

Collecting a debt can be frustrating when the person who owes you won’t even respond, let alone pay you back. If you own a small business, collecting can be essential to keeping your doors open.

There are different ways an attorney can help you get the money you’re owed. They might start by trying what you’ve tried – sending a letter, for example. Often, when it comes from your attorney rather than you, it’s enough to motivate the debtor to pay up. When that doesn’t work, a good debt collection attorney should move right to the next step and file a lawsuit. If they can get a judgment in your favor (a court ruling that you are owed the money) then there are things you can do to force payment.

Debt collection attorneys often send notice to the debtor, detailing the history of the debt and most importantly giving a deadline for payment. The letter often says that legal action will be taken if the debt is not paid by the deadline. If there is no response, or a less than ideal response, your attorney shouldn’t hesitate to file a lawsuit demanding payment. If you’ve had a debtor who has been ignoring you, this might get their attention. And even if it doesn’t, you can still move forward without their response. If they fail to respond to your lawsuit within a certain amount of time, you can win by default. The judge will rule in your favor.

After a judge has issued a judgment in your debt collection case, there are steps you can take to collect your money. Wage garnishment, putting a lien on property or having the debtor’s bank pay you from the debtor’s bank account are possible options. For example, wage garnishment allows you to take up to a percentage (usually 15%) of the debtor’s pay. The employer deducts the wages, and the amount has to be approved by a judge. If you don’t know anything about the debtor, your attorney can help you go through the court to discover what assets a debtor has, where they work, etc.

Don’t assume that you’re out of luck because someone owes you money and they refuse to pay or they claim they don’t have the money to pay. Debt collection attorneys often charge a contingency fee, which means that you pay them a portion of what they’re able to recover for you. This also means you don’t have to pay anything up front, and there is no fee if they aren’t able to get you your money. Some debt collection attorneys will charge hourly. It depends on the debt you’re owed and who owes you. Either way, an initial consultation should be free and it’s a great way to learn more about these options.

Written by Michael Helfand

download (46)

The first thing to do after any injury is to get the medical attention you need. Your health is most important. If your injury is serious or permanent, the next thing to do is talk to a personal injury attorney about suing the transportation agency in order to get compensated for your injury, including medical bills, lost income and other ways in which the accident has affected your life. These costs should not be yours to deal with alone.

Public transportation must be safe for the public. There is a duty to keep trains and busses in good repair, as well as stations and platforms. There is a duty to properly hire and train drivers, operators and other employees. Failure to do these things, plus an injury as a result, can lead to a lawsuit.

Suing a public transportation agency is different from suing a private business or individual. In Chicago, for example, lawsuits against the CTA (a government agency) have different rules. The most important difference for you to be aware of is that you only have one year from the date of your injury to file a lawsuit. This is considered a very short amount of time, so don’t wait too long before looking into whether a lawsuit would be right in your situation. If you miss the deadline to file a lawsuit you almost never get a second chance, no matter how good of a case you would have had.

We suggest talking to an attorney who has experience with public transportation lawsuits. In Chicago, we know attorneys who have had success going up against CTA. Their specific experience gives them an advantage, in our opinion.

Written by Michael Helfand

Stockbroker

There are several ways in which an investor might become the victim of illegal broker activity. It can be easy to invest your money with a professional and then pay little attention to the details as the months and years go by, but unfortunately there are brokers who take advantage of their clients and put their clients’ money at risk.

One common violation is when a broker looks out for their own interests rather than their clients’ interests, usually because they are more concerned about boosting their commission than doing what’s in your best interest. If a broker pushes an investment product on you because it gets them a higher commission, or if they excessively trade in order to earn more commission and fees (“churning”), it’s considered a breach of their fiduciary duty. This is the duty they have to put your interests first. If there is a violation, and you suffer financial loss as a result, you can bring a claim against them and/or their brokerage firm.

Although some securities fraud cases end up in court, many are handled in arbitration. You likely agreed to arbitration when you signed on for an account with your broker. This means that you will file a claim with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Arbitrators hold hearings and make final decisions much like a judge. Your best bet is to hire an experienced Illinois securities fraud attorney to represent you during arbitration. The broker will most certainly have a lawyer on their side.

If a broker promises or guarantees a certain rate of return on an investment, it can be fraudulent misrepresentation. If a broker puts your money in riskier investments than what you authorized, you might have what’s called a suitability claim. Both of these are additional instances of illegal broker misconduct that can lead to a claim or lawsuit.

It can be difficult for the average investor to identify fraud or other illegal activity being committed by their broker. If something doesn’t seem right, look into it by talking to an Illinois securities fraud attorney. If they know what they’re doing, they should be able to identify whether you’ve been taken advantage of.

If you have further questions about actions taken by your broker, or if you would like to speak with an Illinoissecurities fraud attorney, please contact us.

Written by Michael Helfand

download (54)

If you have done the work, then you have earned your pay. It’s yours and you have a right to go after it. Many people aren’t sure how to do that, however. There are a couple of options, and our recommendations vary depending on your situation.

We’re talking about unpaid regular wages, when your paycheck is short or you don’t get one at all. We’re also talking about situations where there is a dispute about the amount owed. This can be regarding overtime, vacation pay, commissions or other compensation.

One factor is the amount of money you are owed. For small amounts of unpaid compensation, we might recommend that you start by filing a claim with the Department of Labor. They have a system in place to help workers get paid. This is a good idea for small amounts because you don’t want to end up paying an attorney more than what you’re owed in the first place. The Department of Labor cannot force your employer to write you a check, but they will help you for free.

The other option is to sue your employer for the amount that you’re owed. The first step on this path is talking to an experienced employment attorney. You want advice from someone who has handled hundreds of unpaid wage claims in the past. Some attorneys who handle wage claims charge a contingency fee, which is a percentage of what you are able to get from your employer. If you lose your case, you pay nothing. Another type of fee is an hourly fee, which is agreed upon by the attorney and client. Make sure you talk through fees with your lawyer before they start working on your case.

Let us know if you have any questions about unpaid wages and how to get what you’re owed. We’ll talk to you about it for free.

Written by Michael Helfand

See also: Are you owed commissions in Illinois? That may be up to your employer

iStock_000011301900Small

The law against drunk driving is a bit broader than you might think. It doesn’t outlaw just driving while intoxicated but also being in physical control of a vehicle while intoxicated. If you are sitting in the driver’s seat with the keys, you are considered in control, even if the car is turned off. You can be arrested, charged and found guilty of a DUI.

If you are drinking outside in your yard on a Saturday afternoon and go sit in your car to listen to the radio, you could be arrested for a DUI. If you have nowhere else to go after leaving a party, at least leave your keys with a friend and not in your vehicle. Even if you’re sleeping in the car, you can be in trouble if the keys are in there too.

The bottom line: If you need to sober up before driving home, don’t do it while sitting in your car. The question isn’t whether you intended to drive but whether you could have driven if you wanted to. Play it safe and stay away from your vehicle. While the fact that you didn’t have access to your keys might eventually prove your innocence, it doesn’t mean you won’t be arrested, charged and prosecuted.

If you plan to argue that you weren’t in actual physical control of your vehicle when you were arrested for a DUI, don’t try to argue it alone. It’s an area of law that requires the experience of a seasoned criminal defense attorney. The judge and prosecutor have heard all the excuses before. If you’re serious about proving your innocence, hire someone who knows how to do it.

Written by Michael Helfand

images (19)

When your child is on the school bus, they should be protected as if they’re still in the classroom. This means that they should be supervised and managed so that no one gets hurt. If the school or bus personnel fail to do this and a child gets hurt, a parent can file a lawsuit against those responsible.  For whatever reason, we’ve been dealing with a lot of these cases lately.

We all know that kids goof around, especially when an adult turns their back. The bus driver is focused first and foremost on the road in front of them, so it can create a dangerous situation for kids in the back who want to cause trouble.

What the bus driver should do is stop any harassment, bullying or fighting that happens on the bus. There’s not much they can be expected to do if one kid punches another completely out of the blue, but if there are signs of a problem the driver should address the issue.

Every situation is different, but generally speaking the bus driver should make sure kids follow the bus safety rules, and they should report bullying to the parents and/or school. If kids are fighting, they should be separated (the driver can’t kick anyone off the bus mid-route), and if the driver knows of other harmful behavior, such as sexual harassment, it’s their job to do something about it.

As a parent, you can file an injury lawsuit if another kid on the bus hurts your child. Like any personal injury lawsuit, you’ll have to prove that the person or entity you’re suing owed your child a duty of care, that they failed to uphold that duty of care, and that your child was injured as a result.

The bus driver is often focused on driving, but this doesn’t mean they can’t see and hear what’s going on behind them. If they know about an incident or bullying or harassment, they have a duty to try and stop it. If they say they didn’t know, you can still hold them responsible if you can show that they should have known. It usually comes down to what a reasonable person would have observed and what they would have done about it.

There are Illinois attorneys who have specific experience in school bus injury lawsuits. These are attorneys who have successfully sued on behalf of parents whose children were injured because of the negligence of the bus driver, the bus company and/or the school. If you have questions or need help getting started, feel free to give us a call.

Written by Michael Helfand

A girl’s father is suing the Chicago Board of Education claiming that his daughter’s teacher didn’t do enough to prevent her rape that occurred last spring. The lawsuit says that her teacher noticed her leaving school property with a stranger at the start of the school day, and was suspicious enough to take several pictures of the girl and the stranger, but did nothing further. The girl’s abductor took her away from school grounds and later raped her. The teacher supposedly didn’t come forward with the information she had until that evening when she told the girl’s parents.

While rape is a criminal issue, and the suspect in this case might be facing charges, the father has filed a civil lawsuit. He is suing the school for failing to uphold the duty of care that he claims his daughter was owed. When kids are in school, the school staff and administration have certain obligations for keeping them safe. If they don’t, and a child is injured, parents can sue.

Unfortunately, this is not the first case of its kind. We have spoken with many individuals and families who have experienced similar tragedies. When people call us with similar circumstances – a rape that happened because a third party wasn’t upholding their duty of care (like the school in the above case) – we refer them to the same attorneys because they have won these cases in the past and we trust that they’re the right lawyers to be taking on these cases.

The basis of the cases we see is the same – the victim or their parents are suing a property owner, school district or other caretaker who was supposed to provide some protection and failed to do so. In this case it was the girl’s teacher. In some cases, it might the owner of a parking lot who didn’t replace broken lights and created an opportunity for criminal activity; or a hotel that didn’t make sure its rooms were secure against break-ins; or a daycare that didn’t screen its employees and hired someone with a record of criminal sexual abuse.

Sadly, this happens often enough that we consider it a niche area of law, meaning there are attorneys who have specific experience in this area. This is who we recommend if you are considering a lawsuit. The attorneys we refer these cases to not only are good at what they do, but they understand the seriousness of the situation and are sensitive to what the victims and families are going through. We believe both of these qualities are important to a victim and their family.

As with any injury lawsuit, there is no charge for a consultation and no fee at all unless you win. If you need a referral or have questions about whether you might have a civil lawsuit after a rape or other sexual abuse, please contact us.

A high-low agreement is a form of settlement, made before or during trial, in which both sides agree to high and low limits as to what the case will be worth. The parties are agreeing to put limits on the jury verdict.

In a high-low agreement, each side has the chance to minimize their risk. For the plaintiff, they get the benefit of knowing that they’ll get paid either way, whether they win or lose. For the defendant, they get the benefit of avoiding a runaway jury award, which can be extremely high.

In order to get these benefits, each sides gives a little. The plaintiff is agreeing to not take a huge jury award, and the defendant is agreeing to pay even if the jury says they win and don’t have to pay anything.

These agreements are just one type of settlement. In this type, the jury still deliberates and comes back with a decision. If the jury’s decision is outside of the limits, then the agreement comes into play and the verdict doesn’t apply. In a typical settlement, the parties come to an agreement on a settlement amount and the case is over without going to the jury.

High-low agreements come in many forms and appear in many different types of cases. This is just a general overview. If your attorney is suggesting a high-low agreement in your case, make sure you understand the reasons behind it and why it would or would not be a good idea in your circumstances. In any settlement situation, make sure your attorney is suggesting the agreement because it is in your best interest and not because it guarantees that they’ll get paid. A good attorney should be willing to take your case to trial if need be, and they should have the resources to do so.

Free Case Review
From Our Attorneys

Archives