Find The Best Attorney For Your Case
(312) 346-5320 or (800) 517-1614
Free Consultations - 24/7
No Appointment Needed, Just Call

Michael Helfand

A high-low agreement is a form of settlement, made before or during trial, in which both sides agree to high and low limits as to what the case will be worth. The parties are agreeing to put limits on the jury verdict.

In a high-low agreement, each side has the chance to minimize their risk. For the plaintiff, they get the benefit of knowing that they’ll get paid either way, whether they win or lose. For the defendant, they get the benefit of avoiding a runaway jury award, which can be extremely high.

In order to get these benefits, each sides gives a little. The plaintiff is agreeing to not take a huge jury award, and the defendant is agreeing to pay even if the jury says they win and don’t have to pay anything.

These agreements are just one type of settlement. In this type, the jury still deliberates and comes back with a decision. If the jury’s decision is outside of the limits, then the agreement comes into play and the verdict doesn’t apply. In a typical settlement, the parties come to an agreement on a settlement amount and the case is over without going to the jury.

High-low agreements come in many forms and appear in many different types of cases. This is just a general overview. If your attorney is suggesting a high-low agreement in your case, make sure you understand the reasons behind it and why it would or would not be a good idea in your circumstances. In any settlement situation, make sure your attorney is suggesting the agreement because it is in your best interest and not because it guarantees that they’ll get paid. A good attorney should be willing to take your case to trial if need be, and they should have the resources to do so.

StripSearch-101

School administrators are responsible for the safety of their students, and it’s generally accepted that they can use reasonable means to keep the school safe and discipline those who break the rules. As with most things, however, there is a line between what’s reasonable and what’s not. A recent news article reports that the parent of a 13-year-old is suing the Round Lake school district for strip-searching her child. It brings up the question of how far is too far.

Strip searching a student, and doing so without notifying the parents, certainly crosses the line in my opinion. It goes too far. School teachers and administrators do assume some of the roles of parents and police when students are in their building, but the fact is, they are not the police and they are not the parents.

Student privacy rights at school are somewhat controversial. Public school districts and their employees are essentially the government, which makes it a civil rights issue – unreasonable searches and seizures are a violation of constitutional privacy rights. However, the Supreme Court has said that students have a lesser expectation of privacy when they’re at school. So the law has allowed some leeway, with the idea that administrators and teachers need to have control over their student body.

Some states, including Illinois, have specific laws on the topic. Illinois law says that student property can be searched (lockers, purses, backpacks, etc.) for pretty much any reason and without student consent. The law even extends to students’ cars that are parked on school property. The same rationale applies to mandatory drug testing of athletes and other students. No search warrants are required.

Strip searches, however, are a different story. While there isn’t a law that specifically says strip searches cannot happen, many courts have ruled that strip searches are a violation of a student’s rights. If the school has serious concerns that something dangerous is being hidden under a student’s clothes, they should call the police. The parents should be notified. There are very few instances where a strip search of a student is going to be justified as usually other options are available that are less invasive.

The parent in the Round Lake case is suing for $1.2 million, claiming her son was emotionally distressed by the illegal search he had to endure. I don’t have enough facts to say what this case will settle for, but if true the student deserves something and it needs to be enough to deter the school from this type of behavior in the future.

See also: Do You Have An Illinois Civil Rights Violation Lawsuit?

Unpaid_Wages_2

A reader asks:

I am looking for a Chicago lawyer to help me get a commission of more than $10,000 that my employer owes me from some sales I have made.  They say I won’t get it because I took a new job and their company policy is that you have to be employed at the time a commission is due.  That seems unfair.

It is unfair, but under the Illinois Wage Pay and Collection Act, employers are allowed to set their own policies as to when commissions can be earned and paid.  It’s completely legal for them to say you have to be an employee to get your money.  We’ve seen many other situations where an employee doesn’t get paid until the customer pays.  That too unfortunately is legal as well.

So to determine whether or not you will get paid a commission, we have to see what policy your employer has.  They can’t just change it on the fly and if it’s not in writing then there is a good chance that it doesn’t actually exist.

My advice to any sales person is to get clarification in writing before you start performing work.  Otherwise you may find yourself at their mercy.

But whatever you do, don’t assume that you are owed nothing.  We will always give you a free consultation to determine if there are any loopholes or rights that you have and will of course do whatever we can to make sure that you get paid.  Often we find that other violations are occurring that entitle you to your money in the end.

download (75)

So imagine that you’ve had a driver’s license in Texas or Georgia or Oregon or some place like that for the last 20 years and you go to renew that license which you’ve had for 20 years and they tell you that your license is suspended.  You are confused because you haven’t had as much as a speeding ticket for years and you are also a bit freaked out because you need your car for work and will lose your job without a license.

After a little investigation you discover that the reason your drivers license is suspended is because 30 years ago you lived in Illinois and got a DUI.  You haven’t been in Illinois since and don’t want to ever come back.  But because of that DUI, Illinois has suspended your license and now that you are ineligible in Illinois you are ineligible everywhere.

The truth is that you’ve been suspended for a while, but only in recent years did States begin to share information with each other.  And the law is that if you can’t get a license in Illinois you can’t get it anywhere.

It’s a total b.s. situation to have driven for years and now be told that you can’t, but it’s also something you have to deal with.  The good news is that you don’t have to come back to Illinois.  What you can do is hire a lawyer and get an out of state driver’s license reinstatement hearing.  The bad news is that you have to jump through hoops like this to get your license back, it takes time and you have to pay money to the State and a lawyer.  The good news is that if you get an attorney, at least the ones that we recommend, the success rate is over 95% as compared to around 40% when you go at it alone.

So this is really one of those crappy situations where you can be pissed off, will be pissed off and should be pissed off.  But after that you need to realize that finding an attorney in Illinois will likely solve the problem.  You’ll never feel good about having to do this process, but in the end at least you should be able to get your license and life back.

1364273306_witness

I don’t know of very many people that enjoy having to go to court and testify.  In fact, the only people who really like it are expert witnesses who get paid for their time being there.  Otherwise almost every witness, plaintiff or defendant I’ve ever met would rather be somewhere else.  That said, if you have to do it, I’m sure it is made easier if you know what to expect.  I’m surprised how many lawyers don’t prepare their clients about what is going to happen and how to approach the day.  And if you are just a witness and not part of the case you can bet that no one is going to give you advice.  So for those that do have to go to court in Illinois to testify, here are some things to know:

  1. It’s not very much like what you see on TV in that it’s very boring, doesn’t happen fast and in most cases a witness is just a piece to the puzzle, not the reason everyone is there.
  2. What is like TV is that there will be a Judge, a court reporter, security, lawyers for each side and in some cases a jury.
  3. There is no dress code per se, but you can’t wear a hat or messy clothing and you wouldn’t want to.  That doesn’t mean that you have to wear a suit, but you should look nice.  No shorts, no t-shirts is a good rule of thumb.  No open toed shoes are another.  For men, a collared shirt and khaki pants is usually acceptable.  For women, a conservative top and long skirt or pants works.
  4. It may seem obvious, but your job is to just be honest.  Don’t embellish or say what you think the lawyer asking questions wants to hear.  It’s the job of an attorney to ask the right questions.  Your job is to just answer them truthfully, not figure out what he/she wants to hear.
  5. Just answer the question asked.  The worst thing a witness can do other than lie is to ramble on and on.  Most questions are yes or no.  If they require an explanation, again the attorney can ask for one.  For example, if a lawyer asks you, “Were you at the 7-11 on June 1st when it was robbed?” you should say “yes”, not “I was because my wife had asked me to go and pick up some ice cream because she was pregnant at the time really was craving chocolate chip which is her favorite.  Anyway, I saw this guy with a gun . .. ”  When you add in extra information it drags the process out, frustrates the Judge and doesn’t help anyone.
  6. There is no reward for finishing fast.  Your answers are under oath.  So before you answer, make sure you understand what the question is.  If you don’t understand the question, tell the lawyer that asked it that you are not sure what they mean.  It’s their job to ask a clear question.  If you need a moment to think of your answer or how to say it, that is fine too.
  7. There is a court reporter taking down everything that is said.  She can only get down one person at a time.  So if the lawyer is asking a question, even if you know what they are asking, let them finish the whole question before you answer.  And to the best of your ability, talk slowly or at least in a normal speech pattern.
  8. If you hear one of the lawyers object to a question you should stop talking and wait for the Judge to instruct you on whether or not to answer.
  9. There may be times when the two lawyers and the Judge are having a side conference or when an attorney takes a five minute break or something else happens.  Bottom line is that it’s not exciting and don’t expect it to be.
  10. While it may be nerve racking for you to testify, the reality is that unless you are in a high profile case that is being covered by the media, the only people that care about what’s going on are the parties to the case.  So relax and just focus on the truth.
  11. Most lawyers are really nice.  It’s possible that one of the attorneys will be aggressive in questioning you, but the Judge will not let them bully you.  And if there is a jury, they don’t want to look like jerks so usually they will be nice even if they are trying to poke holes in what you are saying.
  12. If you are a plaintiff or defendant you should be at the court hearing the whole time.  If you are a witness and testifying by a subpoena (e.g. you have to be there per court order), you can leave usually when your testimony is done.  You will always be subpoenaed for the start of the day, but often don’t testify until the afternoon.  Many attorneys will tell you when they’ll need you and often will let you be “on call” as long as you are near by.  Just ask.
  13. Every case and witness is different, but most get off the stand after an hour or so.
  14. If you have a health issue, let the Judge know.  So if you have a bad back, ask the Judge if you can stand as needed.  If you need to take a drink of water, do it.  And by all means, if you need to use the bathroom, ask the Judge if you can take a break.
  15. Finally, when your testimony is done, there is still a chance you could be recalled to testify again.  You shouldn’t discuss the case with anyone related to it (e.g. the plaintiff, a lawyer, etc.) until the case is over.  But don’t stress, almost every time you get off the witness stand you are done forever.

Hopefully these tips help.   And remember, it could be worse.  You could have jury duty!

business-startup1

If you are married and want to break up you file for a divorce.  But if you want to break up with a business partner, the process is actually similar.

If you are going to start a business or join one, it may sound counter-intuitive, but the first thing you should be thinking about is what are you going to do if you want out of the business.  No one likes to think that way, but any good lawyer will tell you that you should have a partnership agreement.

A partnership agreement is like a pre-nup.  It decides up front why you’d sell, how much you’d ask for and what to do if one of you wants out and the other one doesn’t.  So if the agreement says that you have to pay me 95% of the value of my shares or sell the business, there is no fighting over what you are owed once the valuation takes place. If it lists a specific dollar amount the same thing is true.

But if you have no agreement then there is chaos and the only way to get out if you can’t agree is to go through a potentially expensive legal battle.

We recently were called be a restaurant owner who wanted to sell.  His partner wanted to keep going, but didn’t have the funds for a buy out.  So now the caller has to hire a lawyer and file a suit with the hopes that a Judge will order his partner to put the business up for sale.  He can still get the result he wants, but it will be messy.

When you start a business, you likely want to save some money.  I know I did.  But if you are going to skimp, don’t do it on getting a clear partnership agreement put in place that details what each partner is supposed to do and how they will handle problems.  If you don’t then you are asking for trouble sometime down the road.

ku-medium

We talk a lot about experience being one of the most important factors in choosing the right lawyer for your case. We stand by this advice but suggest that you don’t take it to the extreme. More experience is usually a good thing, but there is a tipping point – a point at which an attorney might actually have too much experience.

I was thinking about this recently after a woman called me and told me she was hiring a 74-year-old lawyer for her case because he had “seen and done it all.” The lawyer was 90 minutes away from where they needed to be for court. The only reason she was hiring him was because of his many years of experience.

I cautioned her that it might not be a good idea. Focusing only on the number of years a lawyer has been practicing is not a good way to pick one. It’s shortsighted. Experience is certainly important, but only if it’s relevant and up-to-date.

The experience should be related to your legal issue. Does the attorney’s experience include practice in the area of law your case involves? Has the attorney handled a significant number of similar cases? Was this experience recent (and not 20 years ago when the law was different)? Is the attorney’s experience local, meaning that he or she is familiar with the other attorneys and the judges at the courthouse where your case is being heard? Does your attorney have a good reputation there?

Another thing to consider, if you’re hiring an attorney with decades of experience, is whether they are still on top of their game. Burnout is common in the legal profession. An attorney needs to maintain a certain level of ambition and passion in order to fully represent the best interests of their clients. I think it’s safe to say to say that an attorney with 15 years of experience is going to be more aggressive than someone with 40 years of experience.

I know of older attorneys who stay in the profession on a limited basis. They’re pretty much retired, but they still handle some cases here and there. I wouldn’t recommend them. You want someone who’s still fully engaged in their career. You want someone who talks to other attorneys every day, someone who continues to do research and learn about changes in the law, and someone who still is fully committed to their work. Not someone who has one foot out the door.

images (40)

Actually, it is as easy as it sounds, if you qualify. The hard part is that it only applies to a small number of cases and it has to be approved by a judge.

When you file for divorce, one of the first steps is notifying your spouse by serving them a copy of the divorce papers. If a spouse can’t be found or is hiding, you can notify them by publishing notice in the newspaper, if the Judge is petitioned to approve this and does so. This is called service by publication. If your spouse doesn’t come forward, you win by default, and this is called divorce by publication.

If you know where your spouse lives, or know how to find them, then you have to actually have them served and do things the long way.

Notice is published in a local newspaper. It tells your spouse there’s a divorce proceeding against them. The idea is that they’ll see it or someone they know will tell them about it. But it’s also possible they won’t actually find out and that’s ok. The fact that you published it – if done in the right way – fulfills your obligation.

You may have seen the legal notice sections in your newspaper. This is where your divorce notice will be published. It has to run for a certain number of days in a paper that is circulated in the county where you filed for divorce. If your spouse doesn’t respond, the case moves divorce.

Divorce by publication is only for cases where a spouse disappears and you have no idea where to find them. The law isn’t going to force you to stay married to this person forever, so divorce by publication is a compromise. You will have to show the Judge that you tried to locate them, by contacting relatives, employers, friends, landlords, the post office, etc. You are required to make a good faith effort, and you’ll have to submit an affidavit (a sworn statement) that you have done so and that your spouse still cannot be located.

If the Judge approves of your efforts and your spouse does not come forward, your divorce will be granted by default. In this type of divorce, the judge has limited power. They may award custody but can’t rule on child support, maintenance or property division.  But at least you’ll be divorced.

download (81)

It’s something that allows you the rare opportunity to keep a felony off your record. Section 410 of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act allows certain individuals to get probation instead of a conviction if charged with possession of small amounts of drugs. Section 410 is only for someone who has not been convicted or placed on probation for drug possession in the past.

Getting caught with small amounts of cocaine, for example, is a felony. First-time offenders can avoid serving time and can keep their records clean if they qualify for – and successfully complete – their 410 probation.

In order to get 410 probation, you will be found guilty. Then, the judge basically puts your case on hold. If you successfully complete the probation, then the case is dismissed. If you fail to comply with the terms of your probation, the probation can be revoked and you can be sentenced to whatever penalty the law allows … It’s as if you’re going back to the day you pled guilty, but without the option of probation. You only are eligible for 410 probation one time.

Many people fail 410 probation because the requirements are strict. You cannot break the law during your probation; you cannot possess a firearm; you must submit to periodic drug testing (and pay for it yourself); and you must complete 30 hours of community service in most cases. The judge has the discretion to include additional requirements, such as paying fines and undergoing treatment.

Employers often ask if you have been convicted of a crime. One of the main benefits to 410 probation is that you can answer “no.”

If you can get through probation, you still have one more step to go through if you want to completely erase it from your record. After five years, you can petition for expungement. If granted, the record of your probation will be completely erased. Most types of probation cannot be expunged; 410 probation is an exception.

Keep in mind that 410 probation is not granted automatically. An experienced defense attorney can let you know if it’s realistic for your case.

mike-and-jenny-prenup2

The other day I had a woman call me who was looking for full custody of her kids with the right to make all of the parenting decisions.  Usually when I get a request like this it comes from a very involved parent whose ex is not around or is abusive to the kids.  In this case though, she admitted that the Dad spent a ton of time with the kids and while he was a good Dad, he apparently is a real jerk to her.

In Illinois, to get the full custody she wants, she would have to show that it’s in the best interests of her kids.  I asked her what the argument would be that this would be best for her kids and the only thing that she could come up with was, “it would make their mom less crazy to not have to deal with him anymore.”

Most divorced people don’t like being around their ex, but that’s not a reason to end someone’s parental rights.  I told her that if we found a lawyer for her and they filed the case, the attorney would be stealing money from her.  I can’t in good conscience make a recommendation because it’s not the right thing to do.

This didn’t set well with her and she unfortunately started to cry.  But it’s my job to be honest with people that call me, even if that means I tell you the opposite of what you want to hear.  There are many lawyers that will say whatever the client wants them to.  That does nobody any good.  And if you are looking for that type of attorney you should look elsewhere.  We don’t promise results, but we do promise to always tell it like it is.

Free Case Review
From Our Attorneys

Archives