Find The Best Attorney For Your Case
(312) 346-5320 or (800) 517-1614
Free Consultations - 24/7
No Appointment Needed, Just Call

Illinois Lawyers Blog, Talk To An Attorney For Free

When most people think of having to testify under oath, they think of a courtroom with a Judge, a jury, and drama. That’s from TV and movies, but certainly if you testify at trial those things will be there.

The reality though is most people will never testify in a courtroom as most cases don’t make it to trial. But you still will testify under oath and it will be in a deposition.

A deposition takes place during a process called discovery. This is a way for each party to a case to learn facts and get answers to questions after a lawsuit is filed.  Some of this is done via questions answered under oath in writing and some of it is done by the attorneys having a chance to ask you and other parties or witnesses questions under oath.

If it was a trial, most likely your attorney would call you as a witness and ask you questions first. Then the other attorney would get to do what is called cross examination which is fancy lawyer talk that means the other attorney is asking the questions. At a deposition it works differently. Your attorney talks to you and if they want to know things about your case, they can ask you directly. So at a deposition, it will be the other attorney who is asking the questions and your lawyer there will be there to protect you.

When I say protect you, I mean they will object to any questions that are irrelevant, be a person you can ask a question to and generally look out for your best interests. Even in a hostile case, most depositions are friendly because there isn’t a jury.  That takes away the theatrical element of it.  When the other attorney is done asking questions, your attorney can ask some as well and will do so if clarification is needed of a certain point.

At the deposition there will be a court reporter who will take down your testimony and also have you sworn under oath that what you are going to say is the truth. Other than the lawyers it’s possible the other party to the case will be there and that’s it. It typically takes place in a lawyer’s office or on Zoom.

There are a lot of things you can do at a deposition to help your case. In no particular order:

  1. Be honest. Don’t exaggerate or embellish.
  2. Answer the question asked only and don’t ramble on. Your attorney should prepare you for this in detail.
  3. Don’t guess at what the other attorney is asking. If you don’t understand, say so. If you don’t know, say “I don’t know.”
  4. Be friendly. A big part of the deposition is the other side assessing how you would come off to a jury and Judge at a trial. If they think you will fly off the handle or act like a jerk, it will strengthen their position.
  5. Dress appropriately. How you look also comes in to opinions on what impact you will make at trial.

And what you should certainly know is that there is no reason to be nervous. In the depositions I’ve been at, both as an attorney and as a witness, I’ve been stunned how unprepared so many lawyers are. It’s almost offensive when you consider how much you are thinking about the deposition and how clearly you can see how little they’ve thought about it.  As long as your lawyer is prepared it’s nothing to worry about.

In most cases a deposition can’t last longer than three hours. Before the deposition happens your attorney should explain how to answer questions, tell you about the other attorney and ask you questions they anticipate the other lawyer will ask. This should help prevent any surprises at the deposition and give you a chance to collect your thoughts before you answer any questions because you’ll have a day or so to reflect on it.

Bottom line is don’t worry. And if you have any questions about testifying under oath at a deposition please call us at 312-346-5320 to speak with a lawyer for free.

When it comes to hiring a lawyer in Cook County, where most Illinois lawsuits get filed, it shocks me how long some attorneys wait to file a lawsuit. For most personal injury cases, there is a two year time limit from the accident date to file a lawsuit or the case will be forever barred. Some lawyers wait until the very last day possible to get a lawsuit on file. There are a lot of problems with this. First though let’s discuss why they do it.

While every case requires some investigation, most can have a lawsuit on file in a matter of days, with the exception of medical malpractice which often takes up to a year to investigate. But for car accidents, slip and falls or stuff like business disputes, once you know all the parties, filing suit doesn’t take long.  It does cost around $500 and creates a lot of work as it begins the process of depositions, court appearances, discovery, etc. So some attorneys try and settle out of court without gaining the leverage of having a lawsuit filed.

That strategy might make sense if you have a car accident with serious injuries and a small insurance policy.  Those cases can usually be settled without a lawsuit. But if there is a large insurance policy, the case is disputed, you aren’t getting a response, etc., there’s no reason to wait. A lawsuit makes the other side take you seriously because they have to deal with the court and assess their worst case scenario.

But there’s another reason in Cook County why a lawsuit should get filed in most cases ASAP. To deal with the backlog of cases, most cases have to go to trial within 28 months of the day that the lawsuit is filed.  The reality is that many disputed lawsuits don’t get resolved until a trial is about to happen.  As attorneys we say, “The case settled on the courthouse steps.”  So of course if your attorney doesn’t file a lawsuit early on, it takes that much longer to get you to the 28 months when your case will go to trial if a settlement isn’t reached.

So when looking to hire an attorney, you should try to figure out if they are really a trial attorney or not. Most cases settle and there is nothing wrong with settling, but you have to be willing to go to trial if you don’t get a good settlement.  You also have to be willing to do the work needed before the trial happens. A lot of lawyers just want to do nothing but try and negotiate and that’s not usually in your best interests.

My recommendation is to ask the attorney how many cases they’ve tried in the last five years.  It varies based on area of practice, but if there immediate response is “we try to avoid trial for you” it could be a red flag. I also recommend you ask how soon they will file a lawsuit. If it’s not going to be within a month or so of hiring them, ask them why.

And if you want to know who a good litigation attorney is or have any Illinois legal questions, contact us any time for a free consultation at 312-346-5320.

I was young, dumb and immature when I decided to go to law school. A college friend had told me that he was applying to law school because there is a lot you can do with a law degree and it was a delay of having to go in to the “real world.” I worked during law school, but as a bartender and in low pressure law firm jobs. I grew a lot during those three years, and it turned out to be a great decision for me even if it was a bit accidental.

Going into law school, I had no idea how the day-to-day learning environment worked. I didn’t know anyone who was in law school at the time, and the internet was just getting started so I didn’t have easy access to information that kids fortunately have today. My expectation was that they were going to teach us laws because on TV and in movies it seems like all the lawyers know what the law is.

The reality is that you are taught about important cases and how the courts work to make those decisions as well as important legal principles such as jurisdiction and evidence.  What you aren’t taught are the laws themselves.

The other day, someone called me saying they wanted to discuss a case involving 750 ILCS 5/504.  ILCS stands for Illinois Compiled Statutes.  So every law in Illinois will have ILCS in the official filing. This particular law deals with maintenance in divorce cases which is something I’m very familiar with. But off the top of my head I had no idea what 750 ILCS 5/504 was referring to and I’d bet almost every lawyer out there would be the same.

This wasn’t a rare occurrence. A month prior someone told me they needed a lawyer familiar with 720 ILCS 5/12-13 because that is what they were charged with. Again, I had no idea what that law was but it turned out to be for criminal sexual assault.  Even an experienced prosecutor or criminal defense attorney couldn’t rattle off these statutes and almost surely would have to look it up. I suspect that this person was a bit embarrassed by what they were facing and didn’t want to be blunt until they knew who they were talking to.

It makes sense that attorneys don’t know the law by statute number and it also makes sense that it’s not taught in law school. The laws of every state are different. So if you go to law school in Illinois and they teach you the Illinois Compiled Statutes, what good does that do you if you move to another state?  Instead, most of the cases that are taught if not all of them are Federal cases as they take precedent over state cases and apply everywhere in the United States.

Bottom line is that if you quote a statute number to an attorney and they don’t know what it refers to, it’s not a big deal.

A caller to our office was looking for a medical malpractice attorney in Chicago.  They had a routine surgery that itself went well.  For whatever reason, the doctor kept the patient sedated for a couple of days after the surgery. During that time his hand and fingers swelled up.  It’s to be determined what went wrong, we suspect it was an IV error, but the bottom line is he spent days in that condition. Sadly he had to have multiple fingers amputated.

This occurred during peak Covid time when visitors were limited to the hospital. Things are changing at most places, but even if we were to go back to limiting visitors, there’s one pay to prevent a post surgical error like this that shouldn’t happen. Your family and/or friends must advocate for you.

By that I mean if they are in the hospital, they need to talk to the doctors and nurses and ask a lot of questions. If they have concerns they need to raise them. If they see something that appears off, they have to ask about it. You might see bruising and be worried. It could be normal or it could be the sign of a huge problem. I’m sure had his wife or kids seen his hand swollen up so badly, they would have asked a doctor to check on it. Had that been able to happen perhaps his fingers could be saved.

You may feel like doctors always know what they are doing. They don’t or aren’t always monitoring things. They don’t know what “normal” is like for your loved one. You may worry about bothering them. Don’t. You are the customer. You have a right to ask questions.  And you need to do this every day until your loved one is in the clear.

You also need to advocate for yourself when you can.  Of course my caller couldn’t do anything while sedated, but he sure raised an alarm when he came out of it.  Unfortunately it was too late, but at least he tried.  You can do this in pre-operative meetings by asking questions. I had a colonoscopy and raised concerns about my colon being nicked and asked how they check for that. My doctor is great and I’m sure he’d be careful anyway, but I felt good knowing that I had raised that issue in his mind. After the procedure he let me know that they were sure nothing bad happened. Not every doctor is this considerate, but it’s worth raising your fears ahead of time. That doesn’t guarantee a result, but does at least put it out there.

Your advocacy for yourself should continue as long as it’s needed. If your doctor says it’s going to take six months to a year for something to heal and you don’t feel right, get a second opinion. You have to look out for you.

And of course if you suspect a medical error occurred and want to discuss it for free with an attorney, you can contact us any time at 312-346-5320. Time is usually of the essence in these cases and we will try to help you figure out if there is a case at all.

I recently binge-watched “Better Call Saul.”  It’s a great show, and to me, it’s even more interesting due to how it portrays being a lawyer. While it’s not 100% accurate of course, a lot of what they show mirrors experiences I’ve had when talking to potential clients.

In one scene, a person who is suspected of a crime discusses their case with Saul who is trying to convince them to hire him as their lawyer. The likely criminal says something to the effect of, “If I hire a criminal lawyer, won’t that make me look guilty?”

I laughed out loud when I heard that because it’s something I’ve probably heard over 100 times in the last 20 years.

First off, hiring an attorney doesn’t make you look guilty, even if you’ve done nothing wrong. It makes you look smart.  The police and prosecutors are not on your side and are not looking out for you.  Innocent people go to jail every day in this country. So if you are in Chicago or anywhere else, getting an attorney when the police want to talk to you is what smart people do.

You’ve certainly heard the saying that anything you say can and will be used against you. That comes from what is called a Miranda Warning.  The word warning is in there on purpose as in “warning, you should not talk.”  This isn’t ripping on cops. There are good ones and bad ones.  But neither of them are looking out for you or on your side.  When you talk you can get in trouble.  When your lawyer talks for you, it can’t be used against you.  A lawyer will protect you whether you are guilty or not.

Beyond that, I can point to hundreds of cases where not having a lawyer or hiring one that doesn’t specialize in criminal defense can hurt you. Last year, the scumbags who murdered Ahmed Aubrey were in my opinion only arrested and then convicted because they hired a personal-injury-focused lawyer who reportedly let the client/murderer share a video of what happened with a radio station.   You want to get a lawyer who is handling criminal defense all day, every day.  Those guys thought they were innocent and only their stupidity led them to be arrested.

I don’t blame callers for not knowing this or being worried about how they will look. You can’t be expected to know what attorneys know.  But hopefully you can trust that we are trying to look out for you and do what is best for you.  Especially in Cook County where prosecutors and Judges can be tough, it’s really important to protect yourself. Call us at 312-346-5320 if you want to discuss a case.  It’s free and confidential.

Picture a 20-year-old college student from Wilmette, Naperville, or wherever, and they get pulled over and arrested for driving on a revoked license.  They themselves aren’t rich but they have rich parents who can hire a good attorney and pay the $1,000 or $2,500 that the Judge asks for bail. Eventually, the case works its way through the system and the attorney his parents hire gets the case dismissed or knocked down to a smaller charge with a fine and no jail time.

Now imagine someone who lives paycheck to paycheck and doesn’t have parents to bail them out of a tough situation.  They only drive because they have to get to work, and they too get pulled over and arrested. Bail is set at $2,500 which is money they don’t have. In fact, nobody they know has that. So they spend six months in jail and eventually plead guilty with time served as the punishment. Of course, now they’ve lost their job, their apartment, and their car has been impounded and taken away.

A version of this story happens all of the time.  We essentially, in Illinois and in the United States in general, decide who will spend time locked in a cage before trial and who will be home with their family based on how much money they have or can get access to.  After 25 years of being an attorney, it’s still the most shocking and upsetting part of my job.

Bail is punitive. People think it’s designed to protect the public and guarantee the alleged offender will show up to court. But what about having more cash than someone else makes the public safer? Of course not. We criminalize poverty in this country.

This is why I have been a big proponent of bail reform laws.  If someone is charged with a violent felony and could be an actual danger, then detention makes sense. If someone is a true flight risk, then a cash bail with ankle monitoring might make sense. But for most of the general public, bail is punitive and unjust.

In many cases, a family will struggle to raise $5,000 or so in order for a loved one to get out of jail. By doing that, they no longer have the money to pay for a lawyer or at least not a good one.  So again, the lack of true justice continues. It’s simply wrong to get a different result in a case based on your income.

Financial inequity happens all over the law, especially in cases like divorce or general civil litigation where you have to pay an attorney by the hour.  There is, sadly, no good solution to that problem beyond the State funding attorneys for people who are below a certain income level.

But in criminal cases, we know that this problem exists and we continue to let it happen. And it happens even though there are logical solutions that, while they won’t completely make things equitable, they will reduce the imbalance of outcomes between rich and poor.  So when you see someone running for office as “tough on crime,” it might sound good or make you feel safe. But the reality is that the way it’s done is unjust and ends up leading to more problems than it’s worth in most cases.

When a person lives in an apartment building, what can they reasonably expect in return for the rent they pay? There are obvious answers to this question. A space in which to live and sleep. Working appliances. A dumpster or cans for their trash. A mail receptacle. Maybe a parking space is included in the rent. If you are lucky it’s not too loud and you can enjoy life. Having great neighbors or making friends is just a bonus for some people.

One thing that may not come to mind right away centers on the safety of the renters in the building. Tenants can expect a basic level of security provided by the building owner and/or property management company. Now that doesn’t mean every building should have a live security guard on duty 24/7, but it does mean that at a minimum, doors to the building should lock properly. If there is a security guard there, they should screen the people who want to come in and out. If the security guards notice something they should act on it. If locks are broken and the owner/management company becomes aware of it, they should fix it in a timely manner

There was a recent case brought by a woman who was sleeping in her Chicago Gold Coast apartment when a man entered and sexually assaulted her. How did the man get into the building in the first place? The victim stated that the man walked into the building through a security door with a malfunctioning lock.

The woman sued the owners of her building, the property management company, and a company that employs maintenance workers at the building. She alleged that tenants had notified the building staff that the deadlock latch on the security door was not working prior to the attack and that their negligence allowed the man to enter the building and then assault her.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and she received an award for her pain and suffering, loss of a normal life, and emotional distress. The jury, siding with the woman, made it clear that landlords should have basic, working safety measures in place in their buildings. They awarded her $5.4 million in damages. That is one of the largest verdicts ever for an apartment building attack in Chicago.

Their knowledge of the broken door and failure to act is what made this a case. It likely would have been a different result if the plaintiff couldn’t prove they were aware of it.  It also would have been different if it was a fellow tenant who attacked her, an invited guest of a tenant or someone who broke through a locked door or window to get in. Building owners don’t have to guarantee your safety and aren’t usually responsible when someone beats good faith efforts to keep a building secure.  When they fail to deliver on what they promise you or don’t take reasonable actions to fix problems, that’s when they may be liable.

We have helped a lot of people in the last 21 years who have been attacked in buildings in Chicago and elsewhere in Illinois. Not every case is a winner, but if you have any injury, it’s worth discussing. If you would like to speak with an experienced attorney for free about what happened to you, please call us any time at 312-346-5320.  We can’t promise a result, but do guarantee to treat you like a family member or friend and offer honest advice about what you can do and if you have a case or not.

I recently applied to an apartment for my child as a co-signer.  As part of the process we had to go through a criminal background check.  It came back clean, but took a couple of days.  The paranoid lawyer in me wondered during the delay of hearing back if there was some sort of screw-up.

Unfortunately not every criminal background check comes back clean when it should. It usually happens when people are applying for jobs.  We see it a lot with ride share companies like Uber and Lyft and regular employers as well. The most common error happens when someone has a common name. It’s not unusual for their information to appear wrongly as yours.  Other errors occur when they report on offenses that have been expunged or sealed. And believe it or not, sometimes they simply misread public information and don’t realize you were found not guilty of a crime.

While the economy is going great and the jobless rate is at all time lows, losing a job you want because of someone else’s error shouldn’t happen.  It’s often because the company that does these reports isn’t using all available reasonable procedures to ensure maximum accuracy in reporting. Sometimes they only match a name and date of birth.  I’ve seen cases where someone who has lived in Chicago their whole life lose out on a job because someone with a similar name in California was arrested. This caller had never left the midwest.

If you discover an error on your report, the background check company must, for free, conduct an investigation into the reporting. The agency must then report back the results, and if the information is removed, offer to send this new report to the company that received your incorrect report. This investigation has to happen within 30 days of you notifying them.

Note that the employer has to provide you with a copy of the bad report if that is why a job is denied to you. They can’t hide whoever it is that they were using to make this background check. They can’t just turn you down and not show you why.  And if they are using the report not to hire you, the must say so in writing and provide reasons for the rejection in writing.

If there is incorrect information on your background check and it costs you a job, you might have a lawsuit. We know consumer fraud attorneys in Chicago who have a great track record of success in suing over these errors. They work on a contingency basis which means that you won’t have to pay them anything to start a case and they only get paid if they win.

If you would like to ask questions about a bad background check, you can speak with an attorney for free by contacting us at 312-346-5320.

Medical malpractice occurs when a doctor or other healthcare professional is negligent, deviating from the standards of care in their profession, and causes injury to a patient. The negligence could occur during the diagnosis, treatment/surgery, aftercare, or health management of a patient.  Illinois lawyers who take these cases are typically looking for for negligence that leads to serious injuries.

If you or a relative have suffered from medical malpractice, you will want to file a lawsuit against the doctor, healthcare professional, and/or hospital to get the compensation you deserve for your injuries and to help prevent something similar from happening to another family. Under Illinois law, you have to meet certain conditions first before filing that medical malpractice lawsuit. If those conditions are not met, the court could dismiss your case.

The two perquisites are: 1) the plaintiff’s 622 affidavit of merit, and 2) the report of the reviewing healthcare provider.

622 Affidavit of Merit  

The Illinois Code of Civil Procedure, 735 ILCS 5/2-622, states that a person (plaintiff) alleging medical malpractice and seeking “damages for injuries or death by reason of medical, hospital, or other healing arts malpractice” must file an affidavit stating that they have consulted with a healthcare professional who:

  1. Is knowledgeable in the relevant issues involved in the particular action;
  2. Practices or has practiced within the last 6 years or teaches or has taught within the last 6 years in the same area of health care or medicine that is at issue in the particular action; and
  3. Meets the expert witness standards set forth in 735 ILCS 5/8-2501.

In plain English, what happens is the attorney you hire will complete this form. It’s kind of odd because it’s basically just a piece of paper that says they consulted with a doctor who says malpractice occurred.  Then they attach that report.

Written Report from a Healthcare Professional 

Along with the 622 Affidavit, the plaintiff must include a written report from the healthcare professional with whom they consulted. The report includes the healthcare professional’s opinion that there is merit and reasonable cause for filing a lawsuit.

A single written report must be filed for each defendant. If both a doctor and the hospital are believed to be negligent, two reports must be written and submitted.

Oddly although the report is provided, it’s not actually signed by the doctor and doesn’t have their letterhead.  So the doctor/hospital you are suing doesn’t actually know what expert is testifying against them. I’ve certainly heard stories of lawyers who have doctor friends that will provide these reports just to get the cases filed, but won’t serve as expert witnesses if the case proceeds. In other words, they don’t fully believe what they are writing and the lawyer will have to find a different and better expert if they want to get any compensation for their clients.

Your lawyer will find the expert to create this report.  This will happen after months of record review by your attorney, their in house nurse/medical consultants and talking to doctors who are experienced in medical malpractice lawsuits. It’s important to identify the right type of doctor to testify because the goal isn’t to file a lawsuit, the goal is to win the lawsuit.

Why do Illinois courts require the 622 Affidavit and written reports? In theory it’s designed to prevent frivolous lawsuits. If you can’t find a doctor who says the health care provider screwed up, then a lawsuit can’t be filed. In that regard it’s a really good rule. While I’m only interested in the rights of potential plaintiffs, there certainly is an argument that can be made that the expert witnesses should be disclosed right away. Without it, a slimy attorney could theoretically fake an affidavit to get a case filed.  That said, the reality is that these cases are so expensive and so hard to win that most law firms won’t take them on if they don’t think they have merit.

One important thing to know is that the “best” firms in these cases don’t ask their clients to find an expert and they don’t ask their clients to pay for the expert.  If the attorney you hired is asking you to find a doctor to testify, then you either don’t have a case or went to the wrong firm.

We realize that this information is a bit technical and may seem like a lot of legal mumbo jumbo. Feel free to contact us if you’d like to talk through your medical malpractice case. We can discuss the next steps and how an attorney can help at no cost to you. You can speak with a lawyer for free any time at 312-346-5320.

See also: The biggest reason Illinois lawyers get sued for legal malpractice

We are Chicago lawyers who will talk to you for free about any Illinois legal matter. Fill out our contact form or call us any time at 312-346-5320.

We get so many good legal questions that aren’t worthy of a full blog. So every few months I like to group the “best of the rest” in to one post.  Here are some great questions we’ve received recently:

I just found out that my ex-husband took out a life insurance policy on me. Is that legal?

It is. It’s up to the insurance company to choose to write or not write a life insurance policy.  They don’t need your approval, but typically won’t do this because they can’t give you a medical exam. Most likely this is either a continuation of an old policy or an accidental death policy that would cover you if you were killed in a car accident or something like that. Your ex is likely wasting money.

Can you turn down an inheritance? It’s not much and I really don’t want it or to have to go through the legal hurdles.

Yes you can. This is called disclaiming an inheritance and it typically involves putting that in writing.

How do I fire my lawyer? They hardly return my calls and when they do they are really rude.

It doesn’t sound like calling them would do the trick. For most cases I would encourage you to have someone in place before getting rid of your current representation. It’s usually not hard to find (we can help with that), but in some cases it can be.  In my experience, the new attorney can help you in communicating to the old one.  In cases that are in court, the lawyer will need permission of the Judge to get out of the case.

I was accused of shoplifting. I didn’t do it. I wasn’t arrested, but the store had a lawyer send me a letter saying that I need to pay a re-stocking fee of the item for $400.00 and that if I don’t do it I could be arrested or sued. Do I have to pay?

No. I’m not saying you can’t get arrested still. It’s not likely, but possible. I’m not saying they won’t sue you. It’s not likely, but possible.  But in any case they’d have to prove you did it and the fee for their damages can’t just be random like that.  I think the attorneys who do this work are kind of gross and if it was me I wouldn’t pay, especially if I didn’t do anything. That’s not a guarantee of a result, but you don’t usually see a company paying a lawyer to sue someone for a few hundred dollars and if you were going to be arrested it likely would have happened already in most cases.  I really don’t like these tactics because they, in my opinion, take advantage of a lot of people.

There was hair in my food. I’m so grossed out. Can I sue for that?

Anyone can sue for anything, but I don’t know any attorney who would take that case as it has no value beyond replacing the food you bought.

My soon to be ex wants to sell our home.  I don’t want to. We are both on the title. Can she just list it without my approval?

Not unless she forges your name. If you are on the title, a sale can’t happen without your approval unless they get a court order to do so.

I was sued for a car accident but the other person ran the red light. How is that possible?

People lie all the time about what happened and insurance companies go after people who don’t have insurance.  So there is a likelihood that one of those two things is happening here. Or maybe the police report got it wrong. Bottom line is that if you did get sued and had insurance at the time of the accident, report it to them and let them sort it out. That’s what they are there for.

My brother got killed by a random person.  We learned that person was having a psychotic episode because their doctor took them off of their meds.  Can we sue that doctor for not monitoring their patient which led to my brother’s death.

This is a really sad situation. Unfortunately, doctors generally don’t owe a duty to third parties. So if their malpractice causes harm to someone who isn’t their patient, courts have ruled that they can’t be held responsible.

We’ll do another one of these in a few months. If at any time you have a question, no matter what it is, please do not hesitate to contact us.

We are experienced Illinois attorneys who since 2001 have helped hundreds of thousands of people with their legal situations. Call us any time at 312-346-5320 for a free consultation. We help everywhere in Illinois.

Any time there is a police report involving a car accident in Illinois, it will list the vehicles involved.  Most crashes involve two cars and they list one car as vehicle one and the other as vehicle two. That might not seem relevant, but it’s quite often the most important part of any car accident lawsuit in Illinois.

On these reports, vehicle one is typically listing the person who the police officer on the scene believes is at fault.  That usually involves them getting a ticket, but doesn’t have to. There will also be a written statement as to what happened and what citations were given, but generally speaking, if you are listed as vehicle two, you’ll have a right to sue the other person. And if you are listed as vehicle one, the officer is saying it was your fault.

Of course in most cases the police officers don’t directly witness these accidents and make their reports based on the statements of the parties. And for many of them, they don’t really care if they get it right or not. It’s paperwork and cops don’t love paperwork.  So if you get hit by someone and end up getting taken away by ambulance, it’s not unusual for the crash scene officer to just take the word of the person that ran in to you. If that person lies, you’ll be listed at fault if you didn’t get a chance to tell your side of the story.

I’m noticing these types of errors more and more recently. In one case, a young kid ran a stop sign and slammed in to a woman’s vehicle who had the right away. She was taken away from the scene in an ambulance with severe injuries. The young kid lied about where he was coming from and she ended up with the ticket. Fortunately video proved that she wasn’t at fault.

The most important thing to remember is that while being listed at fault on the police report is a hurdle, it’s not one that you can’t overcome.  An experienced car accident attorney will investigate the damage on your car, seek out witness statements, search for video recordings, etc. If the damage to your vehicle is at your back bumper, that doesn’t make your case a slam dunk, but can go a long way toward showing that what you are saying happened is the truth. In some cases we can get police officers to amend their reports.

This of course can be very frustrating when you know you weren’t at fault.  The opposing insurance company not only will use it as a reason to deny you payment, but will also go after you. My advice is to not panic. Just get an attorney in your corner who knows what they are doing and has a track record of success to prove it. If you would like a referral to lawyer who handles car accident injury cases, please contact us any time.

Everyone who is currently or was in the past licensed to practice law in Illinois does so through the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC).  Sometimes I will look up the name of a lawyer for their contact information and see the name of a similar attorney from the early 1800’s. It’s kind of wild, but a great tool for knowing if any specific person is currently authorized to practice law or ever was in the past.

The ARDC released their annual report recently and it had a lot of interesting information.  Currently there are over 95,000 people licensed to practice law and more than 66,500 of those are in Illinois, with almost 29,000 living/working outside of Illinois. It’s not uncommon for someone to get admitted here and then move out of state and either work remotely or get a license in their new state. They keep their Illinois license active for many reasons including convenience, referral fees and because they still do work here.

Approximately 60% of the licensed lawyers are male and 40% are female with .07% reporting as non-binary. I would expect that women will narrow the gap as time goes on. About 47% of all attorneys have been practicing for between 11-30 years so there are a lot of experienced lawyers out there.  Just 10% have less than five years experience and 2% have more than 50 years experience. Generally speaking I tell people not to hire someone too young or too old that they aren’t doing law full time anymore. Just because you have an active law license doesn’t mean you are actively working.

Of the attorneys located in Illinois, 87% of them are in the Chicago area with over 47,000 of those in Cook County alone. So as you get downstate, sometimes it can be more challenging to find the right attorney.  27% of attorneys are solo practicioners meaning that there are no other attorneys in their firm.  26% of lawyers work in firms with over 100 lawyers and another 26% work in firms with 2-10 lawyers.

In 2021, there were 3,881 grievances against 2,979 lawyers representing 3.1% of all registered lawyers.  The main allegations were neglect, failure to communicate, improper billing and incompetence. The two most common areas of complaint were criminal law and family law. Together they comprised over half the allegations.

The number one reason for discipline against attorneys was fraud. In my experience of reading these findings that usually means they stole or misappropriated funds.  In 2021, 16 attorneys were disbarred which means they can never practice law again. That tells you that they did something serious. 12 others were given indefinite suspensions.

Of the 83 attorneys in total who were disciplined last year, 70% of those were solo practicioners. That can be a warning sign for you when it comes to hiring a lawyer. Sometimes these attorneys don’t have a good support staff or become bogged down by too many cases, but can’t afford to hire someone to help. Other times they take on cases they shouldn’t because they need the money. I’m not saying you should never hire a one lawyer firm, but you should think about if there aren’t better choices.

When an Illinois attorney steals from a client, the ARDC has a program in place to help you recover some of your lost funds. Last year they gave out over $715,000.00 from 58 claims against 31 different lawyers. I doubt that everyone was made whole, but every little bit helps.  22% of those payments came from real estate or loan modification cases.

The ARDC to their credit is also worried about substance abuse and mental illness.  183 attorneys were monitored for this issue with 40 of those referred for treatment help.

It’s great that this information is so public and transparent. If you want to read the full report go to their site.

I try to never fly out of O’Hare because for me getting to Midway is easier.  It’s about half the time on the train from the Loop and when you get to the airport at O’Hare it feels like it takes forever to actually get to a gate. That’s to be expected at what was once known as the world’s busiest airport.

Despite my personal preferences, more than 30 million people come through O’Hare each year which is almost double the traffic of Midway.  And while crimes can occur at both places, I definitely see more arrests at O’Hare by far.  One of the biggest is for people who are found to have a gun in their carry on luggage or a loaded weapon in their checked luggage.  While you can legally check an unloaded firearm in a locked hard-sided container, many people make a mistake.

The most common error we see is someone who simply forgot that they had a gun in a backpack or didn’t know. Often these are legal gun owners from places like Indiana who drove to O’Hare to catch a longer flight.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) can issue a civil penalty to you for this type of violation with a first offense being around $4,000.  The fine could exceed $13,000 depending on aggravating factors.  The bigger worry is that in most cases you will get arrested for this error and charged with at least a misdemeanor. That is potentially punishable by up to a year in jail. Of course a felony charge could have a more significant jail sentence.  Although TSA is a Federal agency, any arrest would be made by the Chicago Police and you’d end up in criminal court in Cook County.  You will get arrested even if you have a valid FOID card and a concealed carry permit. Simply put, there is no right to bring a gun through security at an airport.

The good news is that most of these cases are charged as misdemeanors and attorneys who know how to defend criminal gun charge cases in Chicago can usually get the case dismissed.  There’s no guarantee of that of course, but in almost every case we’ve been contacted in, the lawyers we have recommended have been able to achieve a successful outcome to the case.

In other words, this arrest is of course something you should worry about, but not something to panic about.  Unlawful use of a weapon is a serious charge, but with the right attorney in your corner, you can avoid a conviction and jail time.  Most of these attorneys are former prosecutors with over 20 years of experience and a great track record of success.

If you would like to speak with a lawyer for free about these charges and get help in a referral to the best Chicago criminal defense attorney for your case, please call us any time at 312-346-5320.  All calls are free and confidential.

We are experienced attorneys who will talk to you for free. If you would like to speak with a lawyer, call us at 800-517-1614.

Although we are Illinois attorneys for Illinois legal matters, there are some unique cases in which and Illinois lawyer can handle a case for an injury that occurred in another state. One such time is when suing the US Government.  There is an active situation right now that we are helping former marines and there family members with, many of whom live in Illinois or surrounding areas.

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune is a military training facility in Jacksonville, North Carolina. Those serving in the United States Marine Corps and going through combat training likely spent time at Camp Lejeune.

Between 1953 and 1987, the servicemen and women at Camp Lejeune, their family members (including those in utero), and others who worked there were exposed to contaminated water. As many as half a million people may have been exposed over those thirty-four years.

Water testing found that drinking water sources at Camp Lejeune were contaminated. The main chemicals found were benzene, trichloroethylene (TCE, a degreaser), and perchloroethylene (PCE, a dry cleaning solvent), but more than 70 chemicals have been identified as contaminants at Lejeune. These chemicals are known to be carcinogenic or harmful to people.

Water contamination at Camp Lejeune has been linked to cancer and other serious health issues including:

  • Bladder cancer
  • Breast cancer
  • Esophageal cancer
  • Female infertility
  • Hepatic steatosis
  • Kidney cancer
  • Leukemia
  • Liver cancer
  • Lung cancer
  • Miscarriage
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Neurobehavioral effects
  • Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
  • Renal toxicity
  • Scleroderma
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Other health conditions

People at Camp Lejeune who have suffered from cancer or another serious health condition have filed claims for disability only to be denied by the Veterans Administration. However, there is hope that a bipartisan bill called The Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022 will be passed. This Act will allow those who worked, lived, or were exposed in-utero to the contaminated water to file a claim in U.S. federal court. Those harmed by the water contamination may finally receive the compensation they deserve.

We are monitoring the status of this proposed Act and can speak with you in greater detail about what your rights are and what the best course of action will be if and when the Act passes. There are lawyers we work with that already have cases up and running and know how to secure maximum compensation for these cases. And of course there is no fee unless they are successful and you will only pay a fee if they make a recovery for you.

If you were exposed at Camp Lejeune and have any of the above issues, we would love to speak with you. Contact us any time.  We can not promise you a result, but do guarantee to treat you like a family member or friend and connect you with an attorney who gives you the best chance of success.

There are many things in our country that could be better. Our health care system is atrocious. We have great doctors, but so many people can’t afford treatment, and for many others, you have to go through a lot of red tape to get a procedure approved.

Like healthcare, our legal system is well-intentioned and there are many great lawyers (and some not so great). And just like with medicine, your outcome is often due to how much money you have and what you can afford.  There isn’t true equal justice for everyone.

So what happens is that some people can afford the right attorney for the case and get the best result possible.  Others can only afford a cut-rate attorney who isn’t experienced or doesn’t specialize in the area of law your case involves. So maybe you lose because you have someone who is out-matched.  And for some people, they can’t afford anyone and they have to represent themselves.

I don’t blame anyone in that situation.  In some of the cases like small claims court, it only makes sense to represent yourself. In others, if it’s a choice between paying your rent or hiring an attorney, it might make sense to pay the rent.

For others, they choose to represent themselves because they know they are in the right and believe if they go to court and tell the truth, things will work out.  In a sensible legal system that is how things would work.

In reality though, that’s not how it usually goes.  There are two reasons for it, one that is really unfair and you have to know about.

The first is that when you represent yourself, you are held to the same standard as an attorney. That means you have to know how to properly enter evidence, the appropriate way to write legal motions, how to ask questions of witnesses, etc.  These are hurdles that some people can overcome. While it would be nice if each court had someone to assist these pro se litigants, that doesn’t happen.

The second reason which you must know about is something that ruins the process. There are many Judges in Illinois who simply will not listen to someone who chooses to represent themselves in court. They won’t let you speak.  They will shut you down. They’ll only engage with the lawyer for the other side.  They’ll tell you that you have to come back with an attorney.  So you might be prepared.  You might be clearly in the right.  You might know exactly what to say to the Judge. And none of that will matter.

The legal system shouldn’t work this way. The goal should be to get the best result. The reality is that many Judges view themselves as the Kings/Queens of their courtroom and unless they do something outrageous, there is no check or balance on them.  And not listening to you isn’t outrageous.

While you want to get your story out, many Judges just want to get through the 100 or so cases on their docket every day. If it’s summer they might have a tee time or desire to enjoy the warm weather. Or maybe they have a kid and want to pick them up from school. Or it could be a Friday (the worst day to be in court if you are representing yourself) and have a desire to make it to Wrigley Field or a happy hour.

So what happens is that they try to move as many cases as quickly as possible. The lawyers that are there a lot know what to say, how to say it, and say it quickly.  In the view of some Judges, if they let everyone talk, they’ll never get out of there, so they don’t let any non-lawyer talk. In fact, some of them won’t listen very long to attorneys that they don’t know.

Lawyers know if they are going before a Judge for the first time to ask others about the Judge’s tendencies. Even that is no guarantee that they will get fully heard and they will get shut down too if they don’t keep things simple and short.

This can be infuriating to hear and it’s maddening to even type.  But this is the reality of how the legal system works. It’s why many traffic and criminal defendants get supervision on their cases. I’ve seen Judges tell everyone in a courtroom with a first offense under 20 miles an hour to see the court clerk for supervision which essentially wipes out half the cases on a morning docket within minutes.

For you, if you have to represent yourself or choose to do so, if you find that the Judge isn’t going to listen to you and believe they are about to enter an order against you, you should ask for a 30-day continuance to try and secure legal representation. They don’t have to do that for you, but usually, if you ask early enough they will grant that.  If you try to get an attorney once you’ve lost, it will likely be too late.

If I had a magic wand and could change the court system so people don’t need lawyers as much, I would.  Or there would be court-appointed and paid-for attorneys when needed. But until that happens just be very careful if you do go at it alone. You can be right and lose because nobody knows you are right but you.

Maybe it’s because I’ve been watching “Better Call Saul” that I’ve been thinking about this a lot, but I did get asked recently by someone if you should ever talk to the police. It’s a really easy answer.

No.

But what if you are innocent?  No.

But what if you think you can explain what happened? No.

How about if they tell you that things will go easier or it’s not a big deal? No.

What if they’ve caught you committing the crime? No.

What if they tell you if you don’t talk, you are going to lose rights to your children? No.

What if they say they will arrest a family member if you don’t cooperate? No.

What if a witness is saying something in front of them and I want to rebut that? No.

Won’t I look guilty if I don’t talk? Who cares, just don’t talk.

You’ve surely heard the saying that anything you say can and will be used against you. That is the warning that the police must give you before they try to question you about a crime.  It doesn’t always happen, but this Miranda Warning exists for a reason. It’s a bad idea to talk to the police.

In most situations, they are not looking out for you or your best interests.  While you can feel pressure being with the police or just want your problem to go away, the smart thing to do is say nothing and focus on the long term.  Whatever you personally think about the police, the reality is that they don’t solve most crimes.  Most of the convictions that they help get occur because a suspect agrees to talk and provides the information needed to convict themselves.

When you say nothing other than you want a lawyer present, it protects you. Anything an attorney says can not be introduced as evidence. The less evidence you create, the more leverage you give your attorney to get you the best result possible.  The police aren’t your friend and are not on your side.  They aren’t looking out for you and don’t care about you.

I can tell you that if you surveyed 100 experienced criminal lawyers in Chicago or anywhere else in Illinois, they’d tell you the exact same thing. And if you’ve started to talk, but now realize you shouldn’t, just stop talking. If they want you to come in for an interview, you either decline or have an attorney accompany you.  In almost every situation this is how you best protect yourself and end up with the best result possible in your case. And that is the goal. Period.

If you have any questions or want to speak with a Chicago criminal lawyer for free, call us any time at 312-346-5320.

See also: Chicago Criminal Law – Will I Look Guilty If I Hire An Attorney?

If you are in a car accident or looking to sue a doctor and do an internet search for “personal injury lawyers,” you will come up with thousands of law firms and attorneys who say they can help you. If you don’t know who is who, it can be really confusing to figure out who to hire.

One thing you should know if you’ve been in a serious accident is that there are certain types of injury lawyers that are better than others for every case.  If you’ve been in a car accident and have $15,000.00 in medical bills, hiring a lawyer who regularly handles major trucking crash injuries would not be a good idea.  And if you have a very serious injury case such as a death, something that required surgeries, etc., hiring a law firm that usually handles smaller cases would not be a great idea.

The bigger firm cases will usually turn down your case if it’s too small or refer you elsewhere. Most firms that don’t regularly handle seven-figure cases though will act like they do if your case is catastrophic and could be worth a lot. They want to make money and some will sadly do what’s best for them and not best for you.  So how do you avoid hiring the wrong firm if you have a potential seven-figure case?

One great question you can ask is, “How many seven-figure cases have you tried or settled in the last five years?” It’s a really direct and relevant question.  There’s no magic number answer, but if you ask it to a few different firms and one says zero, another says two, and the third says 15, it’s a really strong indicator as to who is used to dealing with high-value cases and who isn’t.

Some of these less accomplished attorneys who don’t have the track record you should want will try to tell you that they are great trial attorneys. That may be true for the cases that they usually handle, but you don’t want them getting their first experience with a major case while representing you.  You also don’t want a firm to feel pressure to settle a case for $3 million when it may be worth $15 million.

In many ways, figuring out who to hire is like realizing that just because someone can run a five-person business doesn’t mean that they could be CEO of United Airlines or some major corporation like that.  There is a huge difference between running a five-person company and a 100 person company and a 10,000 employee company.  The skillset for each is way different which is why you see these companies bring in new people with experience as they grow.

The same idea is true when it comes to hiring a lawyer. The small case attorney might fantasize that they could do well with a big case and they might be right. But more likely than not your best chance of success comes from a law firm that can really show a track record of winning these cases and getting the best results possible.

If you have any questions or want our lawyers to refer you to the best personal injury law firm for your case, please call for free at any time at 312-346-5320.

We are lawyers who will talk to you for free and give you a referral to the best attorney for your situation. Call us any time at 312-346-5320 to discuss your case. 

When you are hurt on the job in Illinois, and your doctor takes you off work (or gives you restrictions that your job can’t accommodate), you are entitled to temporary total disability benefits or TTD.  This is 2/3 of your average weekly wage, tax-free.  This is of course very important because this money allows you to survive while you focus on getting healthy.

Sadly, many injured workers in Illinois have to deal with shady insurance companies. They are looking for a way to not pay you your owed benefits and sometimes do it in an illegal manner.  So what do you do when your check is constantly late or stops showing up without any reason?

The first thing to know is that you are not alone. This is a common insurance company tactic when it comes to IL work comp benefits. They want to frustrate you so you’ll go against your doctor’s advice and return to work before it’s safe to do so. They know that many people live paycheck to paycheck and if they squeeze you just enough that you’ll do things against your best interests. It’s a real scummy thing for them to do, but to them, it’s just business.

The way to solve this problem is for a lawyer to file what is called a 19(b) petition for an immediate hearing.  It’s essentially a trial motion that says benefits are being improperly denied and allows you to jump ahead of other cases that want a trial and get before an arbitrator. While not every case needs a lawyer, when your benefits are delayed, you certainly do.  And having an attorney on the case before a problem happens not only acts as a deterrent to bad behavior by the insurance company but also gets you into court faster.

When the insurance company is really acting in bad faith, we can also file what is called a petition for penalties and fees. You’ve probably heard the term “punitive damages.” This isn’t that, but it’s similar in that the insurance company can be forced to pay you extra money and your lawyer fees for acting so inappropriately.

The point is that when an insurance company is being aggressive to you, you need a lawyer in your corner who will be aggressive back. A good Illinois work injury law firm uses the law to make sure their clients don’t get taken advantage of. In fact, even just the filing of these motions is often enough to get the insurance company to back down. If they don’t, they know they’ll lose and also waste a lot of money on a defense attorney to fight a case they have no defense against.

Beyond that, when your checks are late, experienced attorneys who deal with the same insurance companies and insurance adjusters all of the time, often have relationships where an email or phone call can get results.

In sum, if your TTD checks are late, don’t panic, but also look out for yourself. There are solutions to these problems that can work for you.

I hope this helps. If you have any questions or want to speak to a lawyer, get in touch with us any time.  We cover all of Illinois.

 

We are experienced Illinois attorneys who since 2001 have helped tens of thousands of people with their cases. If you would like to speak to a lawyer for free to see if you have a case, call us any time at 312-346-5320.

There is nothing more exciting in life than seeing your child be born. It comes with hopes, fears, a bit of nervousness, and a lot of joy.  Most births go smoothly, but occasionally there are problems. Some are unavoidable due to genetics. Others happen from hospital errors and at times this leads to a birth injury lawsuit.

One rare, but very serious birth injury involves something called kernicterus.  To understand that though, you must know about jaundice first.

What is Jaundice?

Most people have heard the term “jaundice” in relation to newborn babies. Jaundice occurs when a chemical called bilirubin builds up in the baby’s blood. Bilirubin is a yellow substance your body creates when red blood cells break down.

When the mother is pregnant, her liver gets rid of the bilirubin for the baby; however, once the baby is born, his/her own liver has to remove the bilirubin. In some babies, particularly premature ones, the liver might not be developed enough to effectively get rid of the bilirubin. In these cases, the baby’s skin and whites of their eyes may appear yellow. Jaundice refers to this yellow discoloration.

Signs and Symptoms of Jaundice

Jaundice is common. About 60% of all babies have it. The main sign of infant jaundice, the yellowing of the skin and the whites of the eyes, usually appears between the third and fifth day after birth. Jaundice typically appears on the face of the infant first, then it moves to the chest, belly, arms, and legs as the bilirubin levels increase. Jaundice can be harder to see in babies with darker skin color.

Symptoms of jaundice, aside from the change in coloring, include the baby:

  • being hard to wake up, or conversely, not sleeping at all
  • not breastfeeding or sucking from a bottle well
  • being very fussy, having high-pitched cries
  • not having enough wet or dirty diapers.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Jaundice

The baby’s doctor or nurse can check how much bilirubin is in the baby’s blood by using a light meter that is put on the baby’s head. If the level is high, the doctor or nurse will likely order a blood test. Typically, a small blood sample from the baby’s heel is taken to obtain a total serum bilirubin level.

Jaundice is easily treated. The baby will be undressed and put under special lights that do not hurt the baby. This can be done in a hospital or even at home. The baby’s milk intake may also need to be increased. In cases of very high bilirubin levels, a blood transfusion may be needed.

What is Kernicterus?

No baby should develop brain damage from untreated jaundice. However, this is sadly not always the case. When severe jaundice goes untreated for too long, it can cause a type of brain damage called kernicterus.  Affected infants may experience respiratory distress, muscle spasms (including those in which the head and heels are bent backward and the body bows forward), and diminished muscle tone.

As infants with kernicterus get older (about the age of 3 or 4), other symptoms may develop, including:

  • delayed motor development or abnormal motions
  • convulsions or seizures
  • muscle rigidity resulting in muscle spasms
  • slow, involuntary, writhing movements of the limbs or entire body
  • hearing loss
  • problems with vision
  • difficulty speaking

What Should I Do If I Suspect My Baby Has Kernicterus?

If your child has been diagnosed with kernicterus, or if you suspect that they might have kernicterus, you need to get with a top pediatrician right away. They will test for bilirubin levels and try to reduce them before brain damage becomes permanent in your child.  This is also done with light therapy.  It’s really important that the baby be treated quickly.  You can’t reverse the damage that has been done, but you can stop it from getting worse.

Finally, if your child does have kernicterus, you should speak to an experienced birth injury attorney. It’s possible the doctors or their staff dropped the ball and failed to prevent this often treatable problem from getting worse. Depending on whether or not any Federally funded doctors were involved, you may have as little as two years from the birth to file a lawsuit (up to eight years in other cases) so time is of the essence.

If you would like to speak to a lawyer for free to see if you might have a case, please contact us any time. All calls are confidential and require no commitment on your part.

Approximately 700,000 knee replacement procedures are performed each year in the United States. The most common reason for knee replacement surgery is to relieve severe pain caused by osteoarthritis. People who have trouble walking, going up and down stairs, and getting in and out of chairs are candidates for the surgery.

Knee replacement surgery entails cutting away damaged bone and cartilage from your thighbone, shinbone, and kneecap and replacing it with a medical device/prosthesis. Those devices are made of metal alloys, high-grade plastics, and polymers.

Knee replacement surgery goes well for most patients, but like any surgery, there are risks. So if you had a knee replacement, and the surgery did not go well, you could only sue the doctor if they clearly did something wrong. In other words, you would have to prove they were negligent and that you suffered damages as a result.

However, sometimes the surgery goes just fine, but as time goes on, the device breaks down. There is a need for additional corrective surgery, also known as revision surgery. It could turn out that the doctor did nothing wrong, but there still was some negligence.

Exactech, a company that makes knee and ankle replacement devices, has been in the news recently because they recalled over 140,000 of their devices. The concern is that improper packaging failed to protect their devices from early exposure to oxygen, which can begin oxidation. Exactech says that this oxidation can “severely degrade” the components of the device and can “lead to both accelerated wear debris production and bone loss, and/or component fatigue cracking/fracture, all leading to corrective revision surgery.”

In other words, if you had a knee replacement with an Exactech device, and you had or need revision surgery earlier than expected, you may have a legal case against Exactech.  It’s not a medical malpractice lawsuit, but a product liability lawsuit. Damages can potentially work in a similar manner to medical malpractice lawsuits including compensation for future medical care and pain and suffering.

Exactech has recalled about 147,000 devices, all manufactured since 2004. The following devices are included in the recall: OPTETRAK, OPTETRAK Logic, TRULIANT, and VANTAGE. Just because you had one of those devices implanted doesn’t mean that you have a case.  What it does mean is that you have a case worth looking in to. Time is of the essence. If you wait too long, you will lose your rights to bring a case. If you would like to speak with an experienced attorney for free to see if you might have a lawsuit, please call us any time at 312-346-5320.

Free Case Review
From Our Attorneys

Archives